Killed by camera flash?

  • Thread starter Didiyy
  • Start date
  • #1
1
0
killed by camera flash??!!

i've read a story from somewhere. a guy was trying to take photos using his camera. unfortunately he was standing near a high-voltage substation. once the camera flashed,
he was killed immediately. they said that the electric current flows trough the camera flash to his body. is this true? how can this be possible?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
16,438
6,731


i've read a story from somewhere. a guy was trying to take photos using his camera. unfortunately he was standing near a high-voltage substation. once the camera flashed,
he was killed immediately. they said that the electric current flows trough the camera flash to his body. is this true? how can this be possible?
Sounds like total nonsense to me
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
25,426
8,616


"I've read a story somewhere" is not an acceptable source. You have to point us to it if you want to discuss it.
 
  • #5
549
28


The origin of this seems to be an Indian student who climbed onto the top of a train in order to photograph a group of friends, after that it becomes confusing as to the voltage of the cables that killed him. Google camera flash death.
 
  • #6
NascentOxygen
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
9,244
1,072


i've read a story from somewhere. a guy was trying to take photos using his camera. unfortunately he was standing near a high-voltage substation. once the camera flashed,
he was killed immediately. they said that the electric current flows trough the camera flash to his body. is this true? how can this be possible?
Welcome to physics forums, Didiyy! http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/8645/mythbusterssmiley.gif [Broken]

To my mind the story has credibility—providing it happened maybe 60 or more years ago. In the early days of flash photography the camera operator ignited a pan of magnesium powder to generate an intense flash of light. Ignition was almost explosive and threw up a cloud of white oxide, together with unignited magnesium dust. If this cloud were to envelop high voltage overhead lines there may be a flash over through the magnesium cloud to ground, and with the camera operator holding the ground electrode (aka, flash pan) high in his upheld hand, he would not stand a chance. He would have to be unlucky, certainly, but igniting flares or flash pans in the vicinity of early substations could conceivably be recklessly tempting fate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
TheDemx27
Gold Member
170
13


I doubt anything like that could have occurred with a modern day camera; unless they had a stroke. I don't know.
 
  • #8
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,529
2,297


I think it more likely touching the high voltage line generated a flash or perhaps even triggered the camera/flash?
 
  • #9
867
61


Don't some electronic camera flashes use some pretty stout capacitors? Consider this scenerio...

The camera has been dropped, it's case is cracked in multiple locations. The day is hot causing the photographer to sweat. Sweat seeps into the cracks and contacts circuitry for the flash in 2 places. The photographer is holding the camera with both hands. When the flash goes off current from the capacitor travels through the sweat/cracks in the case to one hand, up the arm, across the chest, back down the other arm and back into the camera through another crack. Perhaps the photographer has a pace-maker or other heart condition which makes him more susceptible to electric shock.
 

Related Threads on Killed by camera flash?

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
786
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
880
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
945
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top