1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Kinematics derivation of conservation of angular momentum

  1. Jun 21, 2015 #1

    kzf

    User Avatar

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A welding robot consists of an arm (thin rod) that can rotate about the origin point O, and a welding tip, which can freely move along the rod, from the outermost point of the arm A all the way to the center point O. The design invokes two electric motors, one to turn the arm, and one to move the welding tip along the arm. The welding robot has moment of inertia IO about O and length L. The welding tip has mass m and radius of gyration kg.

    a)
    Derive and state the equations of motion for this welding robot.

    Consistency check: Consider the situation where Motor 1 delivers Zero moment, and the welding tip is moving inwards. What does conservation of angular momentum say is going to happen? Is this reflected in your equations of motion?

    Note: This is not the full problem. The rest of the problem involves optimization but I think that I can solve it with conservation of angular momentum. However, I cannot figure out how to state the equations of motion in such a way that conservation of angular momentum will be obeyed.

    2. Relevant equations
    Acceleration of rigid body in rotating reference frame:
    $$a = \alpha \times \vec{r} + \vec{a}_{x' y'} + 2 \vec{\omega} \times \vec{v}_{x' y'} - \left|\vec{\omega}\right|^2 \vec{r}$$

    Conservation of angular momentum
    $$I_G \omega = const$$


    3. The attempt at a solution
    From the problem statement, it seems like I am to develop equations of motion without using conservation of angular momentum, but which will still ultimately agree with conservation of angular momentum.

    The rotational motor has no torque, and the linear motor pulls inward in order to have the tip move inwards at constant velocity.

    Attempt 1: Equations of motion.
    I took the first equation governing the acceleration of a rigid body, and applied it to the arm. Let a' be the linear acceleration of A along the rod in the rotating frame, and v' be the linear velocity of A along the rod in the rotating frame.

    $$\vec{a} = \alpha\left<-r\sin\theta, r\cos\theta\right> + a' \left<\cos\theta, \sin\theta\right> + 2\omega v' \left<-\sin\theta, \cos\theta\right> - \omega^2 \left<\cos\theta, \sin\theta\right>$$

    where I have used <x, y> to denote xî + yĵ. Then,

    $$\vec{a} = \left<(a' - \omega^2)\cos\theta - (\alpha r + 2 \omega v')\sin\theta, (a' - \omega^2)\sin\theta + (\alpha r + 2 \omega v')\cos\theta \right>$$

    Now v' is some constant negative scalar (since the head is moving inwards), and a' is zero. At θ = 0, under the constraints of the problem, this reduces to

    $$\vec{a} = \left< -\omega^2, \alpha r + 2 \omega v' \right>$$

    but I cannot see if this is relevant or not.

    Attempt 2: Working backwards

    From the conservation of angular momentum equation,

    $$ (I_O + m k_g^2 + mr_f^2)r_f^2 \omega_f = (I_O + m k_g^2 + mr_i^2)r_i^2 \omega_i$$
    $$ \omega_f = \frac{(I_O + m k_g^2 + mr_i^2)r_i^2 \omega_i}{(I_O + m k_g^2 + mr_f^2)r_f^2}$$

    But once again I fail to see its relevance.

    Attempt 3: Forces

    The force applied by the linear motor must be equal to the centripetal force,
    $$\vec{F} = -\omega^2 \vec{r}m$$
    but I instantly gave up on this.

    Is there some crucial thing that I am missing, or am I misinterpreting the question?

    Thank you for reading.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 26, 2015 #2
    Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Kinematics derivation of conservation of angular momentum
Loading...