Wikipedia's derivation of the Schrodinger equation apparently includes the premise that the energy of a particle is the product of Planck's constant and the particle's frequency.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

E = hf

I have seen this equation before for photons but when applied to matter, I'm confused. If we assume the following

[tex] E = \frac {p^2}{2m} [/tex]

[tex] \lambda = \frac {h}{p} [/tex]

[tex] p = mv [/tex]

[tex] \lambda f = v [/tex]

where

E = energy

p = momentum

m = mass

λ = wavelength

f = frequency

v = velocity

simple algebraic manipulation yields E = hf/2 , not hf. The only relationship not mentioned in the derivation is the λf = v, but how could that not be true for a wave of any kind?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Kinetic energy of matter

Loading...

Similar Threads - Kinetic energy matter | Date |
---|---|

I Kinetic and Potential energy operators commutation | Jun 16, 2017 |

B Why does waveform exp[iwt] have negative kinetic energy? | May 10, 2017 |

B Rest Energy - Kinetic Energy | Feb 28, 2017 |

I Internal rotation kinetic energy operator | Feb 3, 2017 |

I Mean orbital kinetic energy | Feb 1, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**