Kinetic Energy & Work: Solving the Physics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ginny Mac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetic
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Ginny Mac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am a full-time student and Physics major. Currently, among my other classes, I am taking Mechanics and Calculus II at once, boy this semester is a bugger. I am studying like mad and not seeing results. I think I understand physics concepts much better than I understand all of the math that is involved! I certainly need to improve my math techniques. Here is one from the homework that has stumped me:

Imagine three different masses are hung from a spring alongside a ruler. The first mass (F=mg=W=110 N) shows a displacement of 40 mm, the second mass (F=mg=W=240 N) shows a dis. of 60 mm, and the final mass of unknown weight is at 30 mm. Here's where I am having trouble: I need to find out a) which mark the spring will be at if there is no mass on the spring and b) the weight of the final mass.

I'm confused! If I use Hooke's Law, F= -kx, I can find the spring constant k when I know the force and the position x, but how do we find k if we do not know x? I imagine we use an equation for work by a spring force,

Ws= (1/2)k*xinitial^2 - (1/2)k*xfinal^2
which involves finding the initial and final x positions to find work...but I cannot figure out how to set this up. Perhaps I am leaving out another crucial equation or step? Hmmm... Any help in setting up the problem would be appreciated. Thank ya'll -

Ever so lost,
Gin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the spring is at x0 mark with no weight. then
x1 = 0.04 - x0
x2 = 0.06 - x0 and
x3 = x - x0

Now write the equation

W1 = k x1 and so on. Solve the three equations for K, x0 and x.
 
Thanks for the help. Turns out my main problem was that I was assuming X-Xo was 0, and I kept getting W=k*0, which is just zero, and that certainly didn't make sense for the problem! It was actually irrelevant where we allowed Xo to be, any arbitrary amount works, and of course, that is why you recommended allowing Xo to be the unknown we solve for. Thank you for helping me to see this a different way!