1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Kinetic energy

  1. Oct 4, 2005 #1
    How do you prove that (1/2)*(gamma)mv^2 doen't equal the kinetic energy of a particle moving at relativistic speeds?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 4, 2005 #2

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Simply because

    [tex] E_{kin}=m_{0}c^{2}\left(\gamma-1\right) [/tex]

    ,which is different from your [itex] \frac{1}{2} \gamma m_{0}v^{2} [/itex]...?

    Daniel.
     
  4. Oct 4, 2005 #3
    ... yet another example why relativistic mass was a bad idea.

    Mass doesn't change with speed.
    [tex]E_{K} = (\gamma -1)mc^{2}[/tex]
     
  5. Oct 4, 2005 #4
    How so mass does not change with speed? I thought that as a particle approaches the speed of light then it must lose mass. What is it i got wrong here?
     
  6. Oct 4, 2005 #5

    pervect

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    There are two sorts of mass. One of them, called invariant mass, stays constant regardless of velocity and is a property of the particle itself (it doesn't depend on the particles state of motion).

    This is preferred by many, probably even most, people, but there are a few vocal people who prefer the other sort of mass, relativistic mass.

    Relativistic mass _increases_ with velocity according to the formula

    [itex]m_r = \gamma m_0[/itex]

    where [itex]m_r[/itex] is the relativistic mass, [itex]m_0[/itex] is the invariant mass, and [itex]\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}[/itex] depends on the velocity of the particle.

    For some more information, see for instance the sci.physics.faq "Does mass change with velocity".

    http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/mass.html
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2005
  7. Oct 4, 2005 #6
    This question has absolutely nothing to do with the great idea of relativistic mass.

    asdf1 - Its a matter of calculation. Simply calculate the kinetic energy and you'll obtain

    [tex]K = (\gamma - 1)m_0 c^2[/tex]

    I worked out the calculation based on the work-energy theorem and placed them online at - http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/work_energy.htm

    Pete
     
  8. Oct 6, 2005 #7
    wow! thank you very much! :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Kinetic energy
  1. Kinetic energy at C/2 (Replies: 20)

Loading...