# Kinetic Energy's Dependence

1. Jul 2, 2012

### Bashyboy

Hello,

I just read an article using math to prove that kinetic energy does indeed depend on both mass and velocity. But I was wondering if there was an intuitive explanation to accompany this mathematical one?

2. Jul 2, 2012

### sankalpmittal

Why do you need the intuitive explanation ? Its itself contained in mathematical derivation.

Let a body be moving with initial velocity "v" be brought to rest by applying a certain force. Then displacement in the body while constant force is being applied on it is : 0 = v2-2as or s=v2/2a

But force applied on it is given by : F=ma

And Work done = Fs = mav2/2a
Work done : mv2/2
So kinetic energy of body is
mv2/2

Now intuitively , kinetic energy means energy of a body by virtue of its motion. Word kinetic itself means motion. Now body can only be in motion when it has a certain velocity (or momentum).Hence kinetic energy of a body depends on its velocity. Also kinetic energy can only be possessed when the work is being done on it (or in fact when it do work). But there could be no work done in absence of force. So kinetic energy depends on force. But without mass , force has no meaning. So in fact kinetic energy depends on mass also.

3. Jul 3, 2012

### bhat.vaibhav

i think that the force by which an object is accelerated determines its speed apart from its mass.
as acceleration is directly dependent on the force applied.

for ex- if an object of less mass is pushed with a force of 10N and a heavier object with a force of 15N then the heavier one will have more kinetic energy.

but mass of the object opposes this explanation as acceleration is inversely dependent on mass and if mass is there then only the force exists

4. Jul 3, 2012

### CWatters

intuitive explanation....

Dropping a brick on your foot hurts more than a bath sponge -> Energy is proportional to mass.

Shooting yourself in the foot hurts more than dropping a bullet on your foot - > Energy is proportional to velocity.