Debunking Kinetic Gravity: Examining Le Sage's Theory of Gravitation

In summary, there is no article that can definitively prove kinetic gravity impossible. While it may not be considered accurate or correct in comparison to general relativity, there is no conclusive evidence that completely disproves it. However, it is not widely accepted and lacks key principles that are already understood in the field of general relativity. Therefore, it is unlikely that there will be an article specifically disproving kinetic gravity.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nothing could prove it "impossible" in the purest sense. One could continually add various rules to it to make it "work" with our current observations. General relativity was developed in the early 20th century and has proven to be the most accurate way to model the gravitation. Kinetic Gravity doesn't even take into account the most basic principles of GR, so it cannot be considered to be accurate. (Or correct if you prefer to call it that.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

It is extremely unlikely that you will find an article "disproving" the theory, as it never saw widespread acceptance and is lacking key things that we already understand, as the wiki article explains. Not much point in disproving something that never proved anything to begin with.
 

What is Le Sage's theory of gravitation?

Le Sage's theory of gravitation, also known as the kinetic theory of gravitation, is a now-debunked theory proposed in the 18th century by Georges-Louis Le Sage. It postulates that gravity is caused by tiny, high-speed particles called "ultramundane corpuscles" constantly bombarding objects from all directions, pushing them towards each other.

Why is Le Sage's theory of gravitation considered debunked?

Le Sage's theory of gravitation has been largely discredited due to a few key flaws. One of the main issues is that it fails to account for the observed inverse-square law of gravity, which states that the force of attraction between two objects is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Additionally, there is no evidence of these ultramundane corpuscles, and the theory cannot explain other phenomena such as the bending of light by massive objects.

What are the alternative theories of gravitation?

There are several alternative theories of gravitation that have been proposed to replace Le Sage's theory. The most well-known and accepted theory is Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, which describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of massive objects. Other theories include modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND), which modifies Newton's laws of motion to explain the observed rotation of galaxies, and loop quantum gravity, which attempts to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics.

What evidence supports the debunking of Le Sage's theory of gravitation?

There are several lines of evidence that support the debunking of Le Sage's theory of gravitation. As mentioned before, the theory fails to explain the observed inverse-square law of gravity and other phenomena. Additionally, experiments have been conducted to test the theory, such as the Cavendish experiment, which showed that gravity is not caused by external forces acting on objects. Furthermore, advancements in our understanding of physics and the discovery of new phenomena, such as dark matter, have also discredited Le Sage's theory.

Why is it important to continue examining and debunking outdated scientific theories?

Continuing to examine and debunk outdated scientific theories is crucial for the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the natural world. By debunking incorrect or incomplete theories, we are able to refine our understanding of the universe and make progress in fields such as physics and astronomy. It also helps prevent the spread of misinformation and promotes critical thinking and scientific inquiry.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
831
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top