Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Kirchhoff from Faraday

  1. Jan 10, 2010 #1
    Please see the attachment. There I have derived Kirchhoff's Voltage law from Faraday's Induction law. Reply me if I have done something wrong and also notify me if this proof has been made somewhere else.

    Thanking you,

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 10, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Yeah, the reasoning is fine. What you're doing is stating the electrostatic condition for the curl of the E field.

    Essentially, you're taking:


    and expressing it in integral form.

    This is a well known fact. So, yes it has been done before.

    Also, the validity of Kirchoff's Voltage law is not something that is questioned or "unproven." It is a direct consequence Maxwell's equations under electrostatic conditions (as you showed) or, (in my opinion ) more fundamentally, of conservation of energy.

    Still, its cool that you derived this result yourself, without any knowledge that the relationship was there! These are the moments that make studying physics really great!
  4. Jan 10, 2010 #3
    Why electrostatic? Under what conditions, if any, is Kirchhoff's voltage law no longer correct? For example, isn't it still true if a changing magnetic flux is passing through the loop?
  5. Jan 11, 2010 #4
    No, the closed loop integral wouldn't be zero. The changing flux would induce an emf and that means del cross e isn't zero.
  6. Jan 11, 2010 #5
    Yeah right,
    Many books (Halliday, for example) use Kirchhoff's loop law under changing magnetic fields and they use $\E_{L}$ in the equation. Actually, this very emf is the right hand side of the Maxwell's equation and they toggle it to the left hand side and denote it beside the solenoid in the circuit diagram.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook