Kronig Penney Model

  • #1
We know electron has potential energy as shown in fig 1 .
Now in my book ( Charles Kittel) it is written that kronig and penney modified this to be a square potential as shown in fig 2.
How is the potential in fig 2( inkronig penney model) drawn to be positive (Vo) if in figure 1 it is shown to be negative ( and rightly so,as in my opinion, potential energy of electron should be negative in presence of positive charge)?
Will the Schrodinger eqn solutions not change in the resp. regions if we arbitrarily change the sign of the potential energy to positive as has been done in kittel?
And one note: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partic...tice_(periodic_potential)#Kronig-Penney_model :here Vo is taken to be negative and hence Schrodinger eqn soln is different in -b<x<0 from the one given in Kittel.Is this and kittel both right?
Fig 1 and fig2 are attached
 

Attachments

  • fig 1.jpg
    fig 1.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 1,057
  • fig 2.gif
    fig 2.gif
    3.2 KB · Views: 674
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,144
817
Man of physics, come on, that's just a point of adding or subtracting a constant energy!
 

Related Threads on Kronig Penney Model

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
926
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
744
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Top