Solving a Physics Problem: Ladder Facing a Wall

  • I
  • Thread starter jasonpeng
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Wall
In summary, the conversation discusses a physics problem involving a ladder leaning against a wall. The problem requires finding the friction force needed to prevent the ladder from falling down. The participants discuss using torque and a free body diagram to solve the problem, and question the role of friction and the normal force in keeping the ladder in place. They also consider the effect of a leaning wall on the ladder's rotation and translation. Ultimately, the conversation focuses on determining the necessary friction force at the foot of the ladder to achieve static equilibrium.
  • #1
jasonpeng
19
0
Hey everybody. I just took a test where a problem described, "a ladder is leaning against a wall with an angle of A. It has a length L and it weighs mg. Assume no friction against the vertical wall and a frictional coefficient of B, find Ffriction"

My dad, a quantum physicist, explained how the problem was done, saying that the normal force was mg because the forces in the Y direction added up to 0, the coefficient wasn't needed, and he used Torque (clockwise) = Torque (counterclockwise) to solve for Ffriction in a systems of equations. However, first of all, it wouldn't make sense that there was extra info in the problem, and second of all, I don't understand how the Fn could be mg if it was applied to the end (it just makes logical sense that if it is applied further from the weight center, it affects the translation force less.) I think he may be out of shape in terms of classical physics and forgot the exact way to do this problem and thus I'd like somebody to explain how to ACTUALLY do the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the friction force that is needed to act on the foot of the ladder to ensure that the ladder doesn't fall down ?
 
  • #3
It sounds to me like your dad's analysis is right-on. Have you drawn a free body diagram of the ladder?
 
  • #4
Chestermiller said:
It sounds to me like your dad's analysis is right-on. Have you drawn a free body diagram of the ladder?
yeah. the normal force is at the bottom of the ladder while the MG is at the middle (center of gravity) so how do those 2 cancel out? if you put a pencil on a table, pushing it in the center to make it translate if way easier than pushin on the edge because it rotates at the same time, so part of the force becomes rotational acceleration, right?
 
  • #5
jasonpeng said:
yeah. the normal force is at the bottom of the ladder while the MG is at the middle (center of gravity) so how do those 2 cancel out? if you put a pencil on a table, pushing it in the center to make it translate if way easier than pushin on the edge because it rotates at the same time, so part of the force becomes rotational acceleration, right?
In your problem, there is no rotational acceleration. It is in static equilibrium. Do you believe that, for a rigid body in static equilibrium, you must have a balance of forces and a balance of moment? Yes or no?
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
  • #6
Chestermiller said:
In your problem, there is no rotational acceleration. It is in static equilibrium. Do you believe that, for a rigid body in static equilibrium, you must have a balance of forces and a balance of moment? Yes or no?
I do. However, here what I've considered. If there were no side wall and the floor had no friction, what would happen is that the object would rotate & accelerate CCW but the center of mass would go downwards at the same time. That means the Fnormal is not as much as mg. Once you add the leaning wall, the F(leaning-wall-normal) will push the ladder sideways, but it still rotates and translates downwards. Only when the friction is added, another sideways force, then does the object reach equilibrium. So if the normal force wasn't enough to counteract the mg when there was no ground friction, why would it suddenly increase if you add a ground friction?

essentially what happens is that if there is no friction on the ground, the normal force causes the ladder to rotate and it also keeps falling. If there is a leaning wall, it does the same thing, except the wall will apply a sideways force on the ladder and make it translate sideways while rotating and falling at the same time (the sideways translation keeps the end of the ladder touching the wall in the same X-coordinate). But once the ground friction is added, the leader stops both rotating and translating.
 
  • #7
Nidum said:
What is the friction force that is needed to act on the foot of the ladder to ensure that the ladder doesn't fall down ?
that's what I'm trying to find out. the Ffriction on the ground. If you mean the leaning wall, it has no friction.
 
  • #8
jasonpeng said:
I do. However, here what I've considered. If there were no side wall and the floor had no friction, what would happen is that the object would rotate & accelerate CCW but the center of mass would go downwards at the same time. That means the Fnormal is not as much as mg. Once you add the leaning wall, the F(leaning-wall-normal) will push the ladder sideways, but it still rotates and translates downwards. Only when the friction is added, another sideways force, then does the object reach equilibrium. So if the normal force wasn't enough to counteract the mg when there was no ground friction, why would it suddenly increase if you add a ground friction?
It doesn't suddenly increase. You are talking about two different problems.
essentially what happens is that if there is no friction on the ground, the normal force causes the ladder to rotate and it also keeps falling. If there is a leaning wall, it does the same thing, except the wall will apply a sideways force on the ladder and make it translate sideways while rotating and falling at the same time (the sideways translation keeps the end of the ladder touching the wall in the same X-coordinate). But once the ground friction is added, the leader stops both rotating and translating.
This is all correct. So?

My recommendation is that you solve both problems so you can compare the results and get a better understanding of their relationship. It should be pretty interesting.
 
  • #9
so the normal force is bigger if I add a frictional force sideways?
 
  • #10
jasonpeng said:
However, first of all, it wouldn't make sense that there was extra info in the problem...
It is, and it is critical that you get used to this. FrI'm now on, in school and in real life, you may be given extra (or not enough!) information and have to figure out what you need and what you dont.
 
  • #11
jasonpeng said:
so the normal force is bigger if I add a frictional force sideways?
We can continue speculating about this forever, of we can get down to business and actually solve both versions of the problem to see how this all plays out. I can help you solve the frictionless sliding version of the problem if you are game to try. Are you?
 
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
We can continue speculating about this forever, of we can get down to business and actually solve both versions of the problem to see how this all plays out. I can help you solve the frictionless sliding version of the problem if you are game to try. Are you?
Yep. Would love to. Let me get my pencil and paper
 
  • #13
russ_watters said:
It is, and it is critical that you get used to this. FrI'm now on, in school and in real life, you may be given extra (or not enough!) information and have to figure out what you need and what you dont.
not in the questions from the book's tests though. I mean it would make sense in real life if there was extra info, but not from that book's problems
 
  • #14
jasonpeng said:
not in the questions from the book's tests though. I mean it would make sense in real life if there was extra info, but not from that book's problems
It is good design to provide extra information in a problem. It helps train the student for real life. And it works to prevent the pattern matching "what formulas do I have that take a distance, a time and a force as inputs" approach to problem solving.
 
  • #15
jasonpeng said:
not in the questions from the book's tests though. I mean it would make sense in real life if there was extra info, but not from that book's problems
The first step in the analysis is to quantify the kinematics of the ladder motion. We will use the figure below to address that:
LADDER 2.png


From the geometry of this figure, what are the x and y coordinates of the center of mass of the ladder (in terms of L and ##\theta##)?
 

Attachments

  • Ladder.png
    Ladder.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 431
  • #16
Chestermiller said:
The first step in the analysis is to quantify the kinematics of the ladder motion. We will use the figure below to address that:
View attachment 206788

From the geometry of this figure, what are the x and y coordinates of the center of mass of the ladder (in terms of L and ##\theta##)?

Well I've found some example problems of the exact same question online, and I know HOW to do it, but I don't know why. How come the normal force is larger when it is in equilibrium but less when there is no friction on the ground if it's the same ladder, same gravity, etc.?
 
  • #17
Chestermiller said:
The first step in the analysis is to quantify the kinematics of the ladder motion. We will use the figure below to address that:
View attachment 206788

From the geometry of this figure, what are the x and y coordinates of the center of mass of the ladder (in terms of L and ##\theta##)?
but for the sliding object: the center of mass is at .5lsin(theta) and .5lcos(theta).
 
  • #18
jasonpeng said:
Well I've found some example problems of the exact same question online, and I know HOW to do it, but I don't know why. How come the normal force is larger when it is in equilibrium but less when there is no friction on the ground if it's the same ladder, same gravity, etc.?
Like I said (several times), this will all reveal itself when we actually analyze the problem. Until then, we are just waving our hands.
 
  • #19
Chestermiller said:
Like I said (several times), this will all reveal itself when we actually analyze the problem. Until then, we are just waving our hands.
alright, let's go on then. Sorry for the delay by the way, I'm in a summer camp so I'm busy a lot of the time
 
  • #20
jasonpeng said:
but for the sliding object: the center of mass is at .5lsin(theta) and .5lcos(theta).
Excellent. Now, using these results, in terms of L, ##\theta##, and ##d\theta /dt##, what are the x and y components of the velocity of the center of mass?

Please do me a favor. Please use LaTex to do the equations. There is a LaTex tutorial in the Physics Forums help.
 
  • #21
Chestermiller said:
Like I said (several times), this will all reveal itself when we actually analyze the problem. Until then, we are just waving our hands.
sorry, what's d?
 
  • #22
jasonpeng said:
sorry, what's d?
You have had calculus, correct?
 
  • #23
jasonpeng said:
sorry, what's d?
scratch that, could you lead me through how I would find the acceleration of the center of mass? I'm just confuse over how the center of mass moves translationaly if forces are being applied to the object away from the cetner of mass.
 
  • #24
Chestermiller said:
You have had calculus, correct?
No, I have not. I'm in 10th grade at the moment. this problem showed up in a book I bought for high school physics so I could learn it on my own time
 
  • #25
Is there a way that the problem can be solved without calculus?
 
  • #26
jasonpeng said:
Is there a way that the problem can be solved without calculus?
Unfortunately I don't think that the sliding problem can be adequately analyzed without using calculus. Are you familiar with the concepts of angular acceleration, angular velocity, and moment of inertia? In this sliding problem, the acceleration of the center of mass of the ladder, and the angular acceleration of the ladder are not constant, but are functions of time.
 
  • #27
Chestermiller said:
Unfortunately I don't think that the sliding problem can be adequately analyzed without using calculus. Are you familiar with the concepts of angular acceleration, angular velocity, and moment of inertia? In this sliding problem, the acceleration of the center of mass of the ladder, and the angular acceleration of the ladder are not constant, but are functions of time.
Yes, I've learned precalculus so I do know my angular things.
 
  • #28
jasonpeng said:
Yes, I've learned precalculus so I do know my angular things.
OK. Fasten your seatbelt.

The sliding motion of the latter is completely described once we know how the angle ##\theta## varies as a function of time t: ##\theta=\theta (t)##. The angular velocity of the ladder at time t, ##\omega(t)##, is equal to the rate of change of the angle ##\theta## with respect to time, and is represented symbolically (using calculus) by $$\omega = \frac{d\theta}{dt}$$The angular acceleration of the ladder at time t, ##\alpha(t)##, is equal to the rate of change of the angular velocity with respect to time, and is represented symbolically (using calculus) by $$\alpha=\frac{d\omega}{dt}=\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}$$
Using calculus, we can also obtain equations for the acceleration of the center of mass of the ladder in terms of the angular velocity and angular acceleration. We thereby obtain, for the horizontal and vertical components of the CofM acceleration, the following:
$$a_x=-\frac{L}{2}(\omega^2 \cos{\theta}+\alpha \sin{\theta})=-\frac{L}{2}\left[\left(\frac{d \theta}{dt}\right)^2 \cos{\theta}+\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2} \sin{\theta}\right]$$
$$a_y=\frac{L}{2}(-\omega^2 \sin{\theta}+\alpha \cos{\theta})=\frac{L}{2}\left[-\left(\frac{d \theta}{dt}\right)^2 \sin{\theta}+\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2} \cos{\theta}\right]$$
Notice that none of what we have done so far in any way relates to the original static equilibrium friction problem that you were solving. All of this is completely new and different. This is an indication of how very different the two problems are.

This completes what we wanted to do in terms of analyzing the kinematics of the ladder slippage. Now let's get to the dynamics. Please write down the Newton's 2nd law force balance equations for the sliding ladder in the horizontal and vertical directions, in terms of ##N_H##, ##N_V##, mg, ##ma_x##, and ##ma_y##.

(Note that this will not yet complete the dynamic equations, because we will also need a moment balance about the center of mass, involving the angular acceleration and moment of inertia of the ladder).
 
  • #29
@jasonpeng : With respect, I feel that this analysis has gotten a little too complicated, even for a smart 10th grader like yourself. So I am going to fill in some of the intermediate steps, and then let you complete the solution for the reaction forces.

To simplify things, we will confine attention only to the initial state in which we first release the ladder to start sliding. At this initial point in time, the angular velocity of the ladder is zero, and the accelerations of the center of mass in the horizontal and vertical directions become:
$$a_x=-\frac{L}{2}\alpha \sin{\theta}$$
$$a_y=+\frac{L}{2}\alpha \cos{\theta}$$
where now ##\theta## is the initial angle of the ladder and ##\alpha## is its initial angular acceleration.

The Newton's 2nd law force balances on the ladder in the horizontal and vertical directions, and the moment balance on the ladder are given by:$$ma_x=-m\frac{L}{2}\alpha \sin{\theta}=N_H\tag{1}$$
$$ma_y=+m\frac{L}{2}\alpha \cos{\theta}=N_V-mg\tag{2}$$
$$m\frac{L^2}{12}\alpha=N_H\frac{L}{2}\sin{\theta}-N_V\frac{L}{2}\cos{\theta}\tag{3}$$
where ##m\frac{L^2}{12}## is the moment of inertia of the ladder about its center of mass.

Do these relationships in any way make sense to you?

The next step is your turn. Your assignment is to solve these three linear algebraic equations for the three unknowns ##\alpha##, ##N_H##, and ##N_V## in terms of m, g, and ##\theta##. We will then be able to directly compare the results for these reaction forces with those obtained for the ladder problem with friction.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
coudl you explain how you got the m(l^2/12)alpha part?
 
  • #31
jasonpeng said:
coudl you explain how you got the m(l^2/12)alpha part?

and how about the translational acceleration? how do the normal forces act on that? and also, isn't alpha also an unknown variable?
 
  • #32
jasonpeng said:
coudl you explain how you got the m(l^2/12)alpha part?
For a finite rigid body experiencing both translation and rotation, in addition to satisfying the force balances (net force = ma) in the horizontal and vertical directions, one must also satisfy a balance of moments. The balance of moments is the rotational analog of a force balance. It says that the sum of the moments of the forces about the center of mass of the body is equal to the moment of inertia I (analogous to mass) times the angular acceleration (analogous to translational acceleration). That is (net moment = I ##\alpha##). For a rigid rod or a rigid ladder, the moment of inertia I is equal to ##mL^2/12##. You can look this up online in a Googled table of moments of inertia for various objects. The derivation of the relationship for the moment of inertia is obtained using calculus.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
jasonpeng said:
and how about the translational acceleration? how do the normal forces act on that? and also, isn't alpha also an unknown variable?
Eqns. 1 and 2 in post #29 describe the translational acceleration. The sum of the external forces are equal to the mass times the acceleration of the center of mass (for the horizontal and vertical directions). Eqn. 3 is the moment balance describing the angular acceleration.

In my post #29, I said "the three unknowns ##\alpha##, ##N_H##, and ##N_V##" ; so, yes, ##\alpha## is also an unknown variable
 
  • #34
could you also explain the equations 1 and 2 relating Ax with alpha?
 
  • #35
jasonpeng said:
could you also explain the equations 1 and 2 relating Ax with alpha?
That follows from the geometry/kinematics of the motion. To derive this, you need to take the coordinates of the center of mass at each time, use these equations and calculus to get the velocity of the center of mass, and then do the same thing again to get the acceleration of the center of mass.
 
  • Like
Likes jasonpeng
<h2>1. How do I determine the forces acting on the ladder?</h2><p>To determine the forces acting on the ladder, you will need to draw a free body diagram. This diagram will show all the forces acting on the ladder, including the weight of the ladder, the normal force from the ground, and the force from the wall. </p><h2>2. What is the first step in solving this type of physics problem?</h2><p>The first step in solving a physics problem involving a ladder facing a wall is to identify the known and unknown variables. This will help you set up the necessary equations to solve for the unknown variable.</p><h2>3. How do I account for the weight of the ladder in my calculations?</h2><p>The weight of the ladder can be accounted for by using the equation F=mg, where F is the weight force, m is the mass of the ladder, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. You can then include this force in your free body diagram and equations.</p><h2>4. What is the difference between static equilibrium and dynamic equilibrium in this problem?</h2><p>In static equilibrium, the ladder is not moving and all forces acting on it are balanced. In dynamic equilibrium, the ladder is moving at a constant velocity, but all forces are still balanced. In this problem, we are assuming the ladder is in static equilibrium.</p><h2>5. How do I solve for the angle between the ladder and the wall?</h2><p>To solve for the angle, you will need to use trigonometric functions such as sine, cosine, or tangent. You can set up an equation using these functions and the known forces to solve for the angle.</p>

1. How do I determine the forces acting on the ladder?

To determine the forces acting on the ladder, you will need to draw a free body diagram. This diagram will show all the forces acting on the ladder, including the weight of the ladder, the normal force from the ground, and the force from the wall.

2. What is the first step in solving this type of physics problem?

The first step in solving a physics problem involving a ladder facing a wall is to identify the known and unknown variables. This will help you set up the necessary equations to solve for the unknown variable.

3. How do I account for the weight of the ladder in my calculations?

The weight of the ladder can be accounted for by using the equation F=mg, where F is the weight force, m is the mass of the ladder, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. You can then include this force in your free body diagram and equations.

4. What is the difference between static equilibrium and dynamic equilibrium in this problem?

In static equilibrium, the ladder is not moving and all forces acting on it are balanced. In dynamic equilibrium, the ladder is moving at a constant velocity, but all forces are still balanced. In this problem, we are assuming the ladder is in static equilibrium.

5. How do I solve for the angle between the ladder and the wall?

To solve for the angle, you will need to use trigonometric functions such as sine, cosine, or tangent. You can set up an equation using these functions and the known forces to solve for the angle.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
775
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
518
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
984
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
14
Views
636
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top