1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Lagrange multiplier question

  1. May 4, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Find the points on the level surface xy2z4=1 that are closest to the origin.

    2. Relevant equations

    Lagrange's method for finding extrema

    3. The attempt at a solution

    If I have a level surface F(x,y,z)=c, it's points closest to the origin will be the ones in which the gradient vector points to the origin. A generic vector pointing to/from the origin is G=<x,y,z>, so F must be a scalar multiple of G.

    I come up with a system of equations


    I can first simplify a little bit.


    I can set the 2nd and 3rd equations equal.

    ----> x= z2/2

    I can plug that x into the first 2 equations.

    ----> y = +/- √(z4/2)

    Plugging those into the constraint xy2z4=1

    ----> z=4(1/10).

    Am I right? What is the most straight-forward way of solving such a problem?
  2. jcsd
  3. May 4, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    looking at [itex] xy^2z^4=1 [/itex] can make the following observations that may help later
    [itex] x =\frac{1}{y^2z^4} [/itex]
    so x > 1 and [itex] x,y,z \neq 0[/itex]
    Last edited: May 5, 2010
  4. May 4, 2010 #3


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    then i think you're doing the correct thing with the lagrange multipliers

    the gradient point to the origin comes from minimising [itex] g(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2 + z ^2 [/itex] subject to the constraint [itex] f(x,y,z) = xy^2z^4 = 1[/itex]

    then taking the gradient
    [tex] \nabla g(x,y,z) = \nabla(x^2 + y^2 + z ^2) = 2(x,y,z) [/tex]
    note is teh direction from the origin to the point as you say

    [tex] \nablaf(x,y,z) = \nabla(xy^2z^4) = (y^2z^4 ,2xyz^4 ,4xy^2z^3 )[/tex]

    so i think your 3rd equation is missing a y^2
  5. May 5, 2010 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Since the value of the lagrange multiplier, [itex]\beta[/itex], is not necessary to the solution, I often find it simplest to start by dividing equations to eliminate the multiplier.

    Dividing [itex]\beta x= y^2z^4[/itex] by [itex]\beta y= 2xyz^4[/itex] gives
    [tex]\frac{x}{y}= \frac{y^2z^4}{2xyz^4}= \frac{y}{2x}[/tex]
    so that [itex]2x^2= y^2[/itex] and [itex]y= \sqrt{2}x[/itex].

    Dividing [itex]\beta y= 2xyz^4[/itex] by [itex]\beta z= 4x^2z^3[/itex] gives
    [tex]\frac{y}{z}= \frac{2xyz^4}{4x^2z^3}= \frac{yz}{2x}[/tex]
    so that [itex]2x= z^2[/itex] and [itex]x= z^2/2[/itex] and then [itex]y= \sqrt{2}{x}= z^2/\sqrt{z}[/itex].

    Putting those into the equation of the surface, [itex]xy^2z^4= 1[/itex] gives [itex](z^2/2)(z^4/2)(z^4)= z^10/4= 1[/itex] so that [itex]z= (1/4)^{1/10}[/itex].

    Check my arithmetic.
  6. May 5, 2010 #5


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    i don't think equation 3 is correct - shouldn't the equation set be
    [tex]\beta x= y^2z^4[/tex]
    [tex]\beta y = 2xyz^4 [/tex]
    [tex]\beta z= 4xy^2z^3 [/tex]
    [tex]1= xy^2z^4 [/tex]
  7. May 5, 2010 #6


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    also as the surface is symmetric about the xy and xz axes, i'd think there should be at least 2 points... if not 4...
    Last edited: May 5, 2010
  8. May 5, 2010 #7


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    1 div 2
    [itex]2x^2= y^2[/itex]

    1 div 3
    [tex]\frac{x}{z}= \frac{y^2z^4}{4xy^2z^3 }= \frac{z}{4x}[/tex]
    [tex]4x^2 = z^2[/tex]
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Lagrange multiplier question Date
Lagrange Multiplier Question Mar 20, 2012
Lagrange Multiplier Question Feb 29, 2012
Lagrange multiplier question Feb 4, 2012
Lagrange multiplier question Nov 5, 2011
Lagrange Multiplier question with solid attempt! Nov 3, 2011