1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Lagrange multiplier

  1. Nov 29, 2016 #1
    Hi, I have a question about lagrange multiplier

    Let's say we are given with the following constraints

    Σ{Ni}=N and Σ{NiEi}=total energy. N and total energy are constants by definition.
    if we take the derivative with respect to Nj,

    where i=j, ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=1 and ∂N/∂Nj = 0 because N is constant.

    On slide 14, it says ∂N/∂Nj = 0 while ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=1 with the preceding constraint Σ{Ni}=N.
    Then, we can conclude

    ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj= ∂N/∂Nj=0.

    This is quite ambiguous to me.
    if we assume we have a constraint x1+x2+x3..+xn=const.

    partial of this constraint with respect to xj will be 1=0 therefore it is contradiction.
    how shoud I interpret this?
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 29, 2016 #2


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    A constraint means that your variables are not independent from each other. So when I have ## x_1+x_2+\dots+x_n=const ##, it means when I decrease one of the ##x##s, another increases to maintain the constant. But the way you differentiate it, you assume they're independent variables which is a wrong assumption.
  4. Nov 29, 2016 #3
    hmm I get it thanks .
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Lagrange multiplier
  1. Lagrange multipliers (Replies: 3)

  2. Lagrange Multipliers (Replies: 1)