Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Lamest News Article ever

  1. Nov 1, 2011 #1
    Lamest News Article ever....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8858355/E-readers-get-heavier-with-each-book.html


    Why do they suddenly seem so desperate for space-fillers?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 1, 2011 #2
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I think this is a pretty neat popular science article that might get some people thinking. Not everybody knows that energy adds to weight.

    What's your specific problem with this article?
     
  4. Nov 1, 2011 #3

    FlexGunship

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

  5. Nov 1, 2011 #4
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I'm no scientist, but doesn't the 'extra' energy come from the battery, so would this not change the weight, or what?
     
  6. Nov 2, 2011 #5
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    The Moon's further away today than it was yesterday! What does this mean for Earth's future? How will changing tidal patterns affect tide marshes and estuaries?

    Is mankind doomed? Stay tuned! Tomorrow: How a dog sheds can change your life forever!
     
  7. Nov 2, 2011 #6
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    The problem is that it doesn't make a point. Why not explain such things where they matters. Instead of for example telling people that living in skyscraper makes you age faster, explain how time dilation practically affects satellites.
     
  8. Nov 2, 2011 #7

    Pengwuino

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I read an article a while ago talking about garbage like this. These days it's more about pumping out articles, no matter how pointless, to make for lots of 'content' instead of well-made, insightful news.
     
  9. Nov 2, 2011 #8
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I don't empathize with the view that this is crap news. I found it very interesting.. wish more news was like this.
     
  10. Nov 2, 2011 #9
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    It might be a lame "news" article, but it's a pretty interesting "article".
     
  11. Nov 2, 2011 #10
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I don't know what you do with your electronic devices, but I charge mine.

    NO articles ever make a point. Why are you singling this one out?

    If you don't like the article, don't read it. If you want to complain about things in the paper, why don't you start with the astrology section?
     
  12. Nov 2, 2011 #11
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I didn't like the article either. But at least I had the good sense not to read it.
     
  13. Nov 2, 2011 #12
    Actually most articles do have a point.

    @jimmy - lol
     
  14. Nov 2, 2011 #13
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I wonder how all this starts. Does a journalist just randomly thinks of something like this and goes to universities searching for professors who can explain and calculate trivial things like these? I don' t think the professors take the initiative.
     
  15. Nov 2, 2011 #14
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    The point is to entertain and inform the reader. This article attempts to do both. It's your point I'm failing to see, not the article's.
     
  16. Nov 2, 2011 #15
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    what memory technology allows bits in unallocated memory to "just float around" randomly?
     
  17. Nov 2, 2011 #16
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    A possible way to interest laymen about physics. Most articles I would find less interesting.

    This article provokes such questions for me as: Is the entropy change of the system negligible?
     
  18. Nov 3, 2011 #17
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I meant 'point' in the sense of 'A brief version of the essential meaning of something'. All I can gather from this article is that books get heavier if you store more data in it; but by an amount so small that it wouldn't matter in the slightest bit. Why not explain about nuclear energy sources and how they fundamentally utilize matter-energy equivalence. Mention Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That way, the significance of the concept would be underlined and if most people do not know that matter are energy are the same thing like you said, I'm sure they would find it pretty interesting.

    Why talk about e-book reader of all things? Looks very random....
     
  19. Nov 3, 2011 #18
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    Because so many people have an e-reader and so few people lived through a nuclear explosion. If you think you can do better, start your own newspaper or start writing freelance. As it stands, though, you're in the minority so far in this thread.
     
  20. Nov 3, 2011 #19
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I thought clocks in the ISS went slower than at ground level. Can someone please correct me if I'm wrong?

    An increase in straight line distance from a gravitational center will increase the rate at which a clock ticks but orbital velocity will force it to tick slower (compared to earth surface). If we had a (rigid) skyscraper the altitude of the ISS orbit (or satellite at an impossible geosynchronous orbit), its rate of time will be faster.

    Sorry for straying off topic. I don't mind the original article, it's an interesting bit of info that might make someone think.
     
  21. Nov 3, 2011 #20
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    Many people associate the equation E = mc^2 with nuclear energy sources, and it comes up a lot when discussing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This article makes it clear that the same equation is at play in all phenomena involving energy and mass. Rather interesting don't you think? No matter, when I hear you say that this is the lamest news article ever I get the feeling that you don't read as much news as I do.
     
  22. Nov 3, 2011 #21

    f95toli

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    No, universities and research institutes have KT/PR departments that are actively (more or less) looking for stories that might be of interest to the media. They tend to like "fun" research like this, mainly because results from "real" research projects tend to be too complicated.
    Also, don't underestimate how important it can be for individual scientist to get noticed by a newspaper, even if it for something you did for fun one afternoon.
     
  23. Nov 3, 2011 #22
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    What do you mean by "lived through'. Do you mean lived through the "era" when all this happened?

    Haha I knew this was coming.

    Is that a bad thing?


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8020988/Einsteins-theory-of-relativity-works-on-a-human-scale-the-higher-you-are-the-faster-you-age.html [Broken] article claims otherwise. I am not familiar with physics so I don't know who is right over here. Can anyone clear out this thing? Note: This would still be relevant to the discussion since it aims at judging the credibility of the article.



    Which is why I said
    referring to Jack's claim that some people don't know about the mass-energy equivalence.




    I think you are right. I only read the newspaper twice or thrice a week and even then only a few pages each time. This could be an insufficient sample size bias.


    Thanks for the info, I didn't know that. Does PR mean Public relations or something like that? And could you tell how a scientist gets benefited by media attention? Does it mean more grants or something similar?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  24. Nov 3, 2011 #23
    Re: Lamest News Article ever....

    I stand corrected. However, I still think any story about Paris Hilton has to be lamer than this one unless, of course, it involves pornography.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Loading...