- #1

- 214

- 1

Another question,let,s take the Laplace transform in 2 dimensions hten how would we define the Laplace inverse transform?..

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter eljose79
- Start date

- #1

- 214

- 1

Another question,let,s take the Laplace transform in 2 dimensions hten how would we define the Laplace inverse transform?..

- #2

- 159

- 0

you can use the complexe analysis and résidue theorem

- #3

- 214

- 1

- #4

- 159

- 0

It is impossible to calculate numerically these integral , because it is a line complex integral and not a simple integral like the reel integral , for this (if you know the complex analysis) their is an important theorem to calculate the value of the complex integral it is : Residue theorem, so use this theorem

- #5

- 214

- 1

- #6

- 159

- 0

When you change the variale c+iu=v , so u change an COMPLEX variable and not a real variable!

- #7

- 214

- 1

but the Laplace inverse transform is not just a special case of fourier transform?

- #8

- 159

- 0

the Laplace inverse transform is not just a special case of fourier transform

But when we calculate the Laplace we use the complexe variables and not the real variables

Share: