[tex]\mathcal{L}\{f(t)*g(t)\}=F(s)G(s)[/tex](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is there some relation between

[tex]F(s)*G(s)[/tex] and [tex]f(t)g(t)[/tex]?

##*## is convolution.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Laplace transform question

Loading...

Similar Threads - Laplace transform question | Date |
---|---|

A Inverse Laplace transform of F(s)=exp(-as) as delta(t-a) | Feb 17, 2017 |

A Inverse Laplace transform of a piecewise defined function | Feb 17, 2017 |

I Laplace transformation of nested function | Nov 5, 2016 |

I Laplace transform using differential equations | Jun 20, 2016 |

Question about the maclaurin serie and laplace transform | Oct 26, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**