Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Laplace transform

  1. May 9, 2008 #1
    let be a function f(t) , and i want to prove that [tex] f(t)=O(t) [/tex] in big-O notation.

    i know that Laplace transform of f(t) is F(s) then i perform the integral

    [tex] F(s)= \int_{0}^{\infty} dt f(t) e^{-st} [/tex] if we assume f(t)=O(t) then

    [tex] F(s)= \int_{0}^{\infty} dt f(t) e^{-st} \le \int_{0}^{\infty} dt e^{-st}t [/tex]

    so it would be enough that [tex] F(s) \le Cs^{-2} [/tex] for a positive constant 'C'

    is this enough ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 9, 2008 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    It is not clear what it is you are trying to prove. You have shown that if f(t)= O(t)[/itex] then F(t)= O(s-2). You have NOT shown the converse: that if F(t)= O(s-2) then f(t)= O(t).
     
  4. May 10, 2008 #3
    sorry perhaps i did not explain myself well, the general idea y had is this given a function f(t) that is the solution to an integral equation

    [tex] g(s)= \int_{0}^{\infty} K(s,t)f(t) [/tex]

    g(s) and K(s,t) are known , my question (more general than the previous one) is , would be a method to prove that [tex] f(t)= O(t) [/tex] if we know that f(t) is the solution of certain integral equation ? , thanks.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Laplace transform
  1. Laplace Transform (Replies: 1)

  2. Laplace transform (Replies: 1)

  3. Laplace Transformation (Replies: 3)

  4. A Laplace transform (Replies: 8)

  5. Laplace Transform (Replies: 1)

Loading...