• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Laplace Transformation

  • #1
249
0

Homework Statement


Obtain the Laplace transformation of the fucntion defined by

f(t) = 0 t<0

= t2e-at t>=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a little unsure of what I'm doing here, so bear with me.

L {t2e-at} = ∫inf0 t2e-at dt

= ∫0inf t2e-(a+s)tdt

How do I integrate this? I tried using my TI-89 but it told me it is undefined. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

EDIT: The complete solution is required, which I think means I can't just take it out of the Laplace tables
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ray Vickson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Dearly Missed
10,706
1,728

Homework Statement


Obtain the Laplace transformation of the fucntion defined by

f(t) = 0 t<0

= t2e-at t>=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a little unsure of what I'm doing here, so bear with me.

L {t2e-at} = ∫inf0 t2e-at dt

= ∫0inf t2e-(a+s)tdt

How do I integrate this? I tried using my TI-89 but it told me it is undefined. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

EDIT: The complete solution is required, which I think means I can't just take it out of the Laplace tables
First of all: never, never write what you did above, which was
[tex] \int_0^{\infty} t^2 e^{-at} \, dt = \int_0^{\infty} t^2 e^{-(a+s)t} \, dt. [/tex]
This is only true if s= 0.

Anyway, for your final (correct) integral, change variables from t to x = (a+s)t (assuming s > -a).

I strongly recommend that you put away the TI-89 until after you have learned how to do these problems, or at least restrict its use to numerical computation.
 
  • #3
249
0
Sorry, I missed out a part.

There should have been an e-st

But I don't understand your point about changing the variable from t to x. Could you explain further please?
 
  • #4
Ray Vickson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Dearly Missed
10,706
1,728
Sorry, I missed out a part.

There should have been an e-st

But I don't understand your point about changing the variable from t to x. Could you explain further please?
I assume you have taken integration already. If so, you already studied change-of-variable methods (or so I hope).

If you have not done integration yet you would need a longer explanation than I am prepared to give here: we would need to go over material that takes several weeks to present in coursework! However, such information is widely available in books and on-line.
 
  • #5
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
I assume you have taken integration already. If so, you already studied change-of-variable methods (or so I hope).

If you have not done integration yet you would need a longer explanation than I am prepared to give here: we would need to go over material that takes several weeks to present in coursework! However, such information is widely available in books and on-line.
Yes, it's just integration. But the trick you really need to handle the t^2 factor is integration by parts. By all means, review integration.
 
  • #6
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
14,408
5,985
It's much simpler to evaluate
[tex]\tilde{g}(s)=\int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} t \exp[-(a+s) t][/tex]
and then taking the 2nd derivative wrt. [itex]s[/itex]. It's very easy to see that
[tex]\tilde{f}(x)=\tilde{g}''(s).[/tex]
 

Related Threads on Laplace Transformation

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
802
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
481
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
594
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
929
  • Last Post
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Top