1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Laplace Transforms

  1. Jun 15, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Laplace transform: te^t*H(t-1)

    2. Relevant equations

    L{te^t} = 1/(s-1)^2
    L{H(t-1)} = e-s/s

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Using e^(at)f(t) -> F(s-a)
    with..e^(1t)H(t-1)
    We can get, e^(-1s-1)/(s-1) = e^(-s-1)/(s-1) [I think?]
    Thus applying tf(t) -> -dF/ds
    Derive[e^(-s-1)/(s-1)] w.r.t. s, you get:
    -se^(-s-1)/(s-1)^2

    Which is close, but, not exact.

    I know the answer is se^s-1/(s-1)^2

    But how do they come to that?
    I don't think the order of my working would affect the final outcome.

    All help appreciated
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 15, 2013 #2

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    You need to show some attempt at solving the problem on your own.
     
  4. Jun 15, 2013 #3

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    No. L{H(t-1)} is not e-s/s = e-1; it is e^(-s)/s. You must learn to use parentheses when writing things in plain text.

    If I were doing the problem I would not bother trying to combine LTs using some "rules"; I would just write out the actual integration and go on from there.
     
  5. Jun 15, 2013 #4
    Thanks, that was a mistake sorry

    So basically use the integration rule and integrate te^t and then apply the Heaviside function?
    I'm sorry, I'm not too confident with the Integral method, but..

    integral{te^t} = (t-1)e^(t-st)

    I'm not sure how to work from there.

    [Googling Heaviside Integration as of now]
     
  6. Jun 16, 2013 #5

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    What do you mean by the "integral method"? What do you think the Laplace transform of f(t) actually IS? Go back and look at the basic definitions---it is, by definition, an integral of a certain type. All the so-called "rules" you want to use are just properties of integrals, applied to some special cases.

    And no, you do NOT do the integral and then apply the Heaviside function; the Heaviside function is part of the definition of f(t) in this case, and comes before any integrations.

    It is not at all clear to me that you really understand what you are doing; that is why I suggest you go right back to square one and start with basic definitions.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Laplace Transforms
  1. Laplace Transformation (Replies: 5)

  2. Laplace Transform (Replies: 1)

  3. Laplace Transforms (Replies: 4)

  4. Laplace transformation (Replies: 2)

  5. Laplace transform (Replies: 3)

Loading...