1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Laplace Transforms

  1. May 3, 2015 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    2. Relevant equations
    Laplace Transforms

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Using basic physics knowledge I got

    Sub in values and use laplace transforms and rearrange partial fraction and I found that

    By doing this I am assuming that the xII and xIII will equal 0 when t=0 because this is not stated at all in the question. do you believe this is correct?


    Finding the initial displacements by subbing in t=0 for both x_1 and x_2 comes out with what is written in the question 1 and 2, respectively.

    However, when I try to sub t=0 into the differentials of the 2 above equations. I believe I should receive the initial velocities stated in the question. however I do not receive these results.

    I receive 4/3 for x1 and -2/3 for x2
    the difference between these values and the actual values appears to differ once I differentiate the sin2t and it is multiplied by 2

    Does anyone know if I should receive the values listed in the question using this methods and have just made a calculation error in my working earlier on, or should I have done something differently.

    Also, the next part of the questions asks to use a matrix and eigenvalues/eigenvectors to solve it. any pointers to help me get started

    Thanks very much
  2. jcsd
  3. May 3, 2015 #2
    It doesn't seem like you used Laplace Transforms to solve this. What is the Laplace Transform of x1''(t) in terms of s, x1(0), and x1'(0)?

  4. May 3, 2015 #3
    I got (s3+2s2+5s+10)/((s2+4)(s2+1))

    I found this by rearranging my equation earlier to find x2 and xII2 in terms of x1

    This came out as xIV1+5xII1+4x=0, then used laplace transform to find what I had above.

    Does this seem correct?
  5. May 3, 2015 #4
    I then split the equation into partial fractions and it worked out as the sin and cos equations earlier after I used the inverse laplace
  6. May 3, 2015 #5
    Try it by first taking the Laplace Transform of each equation, and then doing the algebra.

  7. May 3, 2015 #6
    ok, ill post how I go soon
  8. May 3, 2015 #7
    ok, I just did it for x2 quickly and got (2s3-s2+7s-1)/((s2+4)(s2+1))
    which resulted in (1/3)cos2t-sin2t+(5/3)cost

    this also gives me the displacement as 2 which is correct, however the velocity is -2 instead of -1

    ill check with x1 now
  9. May 3, 2015 #8
    again with x1, displacement came out as the same (1) but velocity was doubled at 4 instead of 2.
    I've noticed the displacement always equals what is infront of the s3. looks like this is because the x(0)= whatever is the only factor to affect the s3 value causing the displacement to be equal each time
  10. May 3, 2015 #9
    It seems to me that this is just a matter of getting the algebra correct, and then properly inverting the transforms.

  11. May 3, 2015 #10


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    It would help if you at least showed the initial equations you get from taking the Laplace transform. For all we know, you made an error there and propagated it the rest of the way.
  12. May 3, 2015 #11
    I started with x1II+3x1-2x2=0
    and x2II+2x2-x1=0
  13. May 3, 2015 #12
    I rearranged those to get x2IV+5x2''+4x2=0

    from laplace I got this for x2

    From there I subbed in x2(0)=2 and x2'(0)=-1, and assumed that the second and third derivatives equal 0

    Then simplified that to X2= (2s3-s2+10s-5)/((s2+4)(s2+1))

    Used partial fractions and inverse laplace to get what I had for x2 in the original question
  14. May 3, 2015 #13
    Good. Now let's see the laplace transform of each equation.

  15. May 3, 2015 #14
    Then doing the laplace before algebra I got

    these included the inclusion of the initial x and x' values

    then I simplified both equations to find X2 which I found as
  16. May 3, 2015 #15
    that gave me x2=(1/3)cos2t-sin2t+(5/3)cost
  17. May 3, 2015 #16


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    I got a factor of 1/2 on the sin 2t term.
  18. May 3, 2015 #17
    I got a factor of 1/3 on the sin 2t term.

  19. May 3, 2015 #18
    Did you get similar factors for the other terms?
    Do you know where our work differs to result in this?
  20. May 3, 2015 #19


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    I cranked it out in Mathematica. There was a factor of 1/3 on the cosine term, but on the sine term, it was 1/2.

    I got the same ##X_2(s)## as you did, so the problem is in your inversion.
  21. May 3, 2015 #20
    From here

    I used partial fraction expransions and found that 2s3-s2+7s-1=(A+C)s3+(B+D)s2+(A+4C)s+(B+4D)

    that gave me A+C=2, B+D=-1, A+4C=7 and B+4D=-1

    therefore A=(1/3), B=-1, C=(5/3) and D=0
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Laplace Transforms
  1. Laplace Transformation (Replies: 5)

  2. Laplace Transform (Replies: 1)

  3. Laplace Transforms (Replies: 4)

  4. Laplace transformation (Replies: 2)

  5. Laplace transform (Replies: 3)