Can Solid Materials Be Used for Large Scale Energy Storage?

In summary, the conversation discusses the potential for using solid materials instead of water for energy storage, specifically in the form of pumped-storage hydroelectricity. While the idea of using solid materials lifted by elevators and then allowed to fall to generate electricity is brought up, it is deemed impractical due to the scale of the operation and potential issues such as instability and landslides. The conversation also touches on the efficiency of different energy storage methods and the impact of evaporation on pumped-hydro systems. It is concluded that, while the concept of using solid materials for energy storage may have some advantages, it is unlikely to be a feasible alternative to pumped-storage hydroelectricity.
  • #1
lfasn
5
0
This idea is for an alternative to large scale energy storage. Sorry for the double and confusing post (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=179768), I should have posted here in the first place.

As far as I can understand, pumped-storage hydroelectricity is the main technology used for grid energy storage. The efficiency of this procedure is about 70%-85%.

Is it possible to use solid materials instead of water? I am not sure how, I am not an engineer. Lifting these objects with an elevator motor, seems the easy part.

If these objects were let to fall down afterwards, wouldn't they turn the motor, so that it could produce some electricity back? Probably yes, because I read about regeneration (or 'four-quadrant motor operation') with counterweights and other stuff I cannot understand at http://www.aceee.org/buildings/coml_equp/elevators.pdf [Broken] (page 5) which seems to be a similar concept.

Could you make a rough estimation of the round-trip efficiency of this procedure? Does it worth to compare this with pumped-hydro and investigating it further?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
In principle you could do that, but for a typical size of pumped-water system you are talking about pumping millions of liters of water to a height of hundreds of meters.

The nice thing about water is that it's easy to pump, and you don't have to do much to store it except find a piece of land that is a suitable shape and build a dam across one end of it.

A solid (even a powder) would form a large heap which would probably be unstable (think landslides after heavy rainstorms, etc). To avoid that, you would have to build an energy-wasting system to spread the solid out, and then collect it together again. With water, gravity does the spreading and collecting for free.
 
  • #3
Isn't it true that water evaporates from the upper reservoir of pumped-hydro systems? Wouldn't these losses compare to the energy wasting system that would be required to spread the solid material?

You would not really have to spread and collect the solid material horizontally. Lifting thousands of tons of solid matter, would require many smaller elevators. I was thinking about it more like just putting them in shelves exactly at the position of their arrival.. Actually, the elevators could be spread around. And why powder? Wouldn't sealed iron boxes, filled with sand/rocks for example, solve the problem of losses after heavy rainstorms? As for landslides, certainly it is an issue. But, suitable places that are less prone to landslides could be found (rocky mountains perhaps?).

Is it possible to construct elevators that would travel to greater heights than the height difference of current pumped-hydro systems? More than a kilometer perhaps? (I am totally out of my league here.. but what happens with elevators in mines?) Wouldn't be easier to find suitable places for such constructions than for a dam?
 
  • #4
To get some idea of the scale of the operation, lowering 1 tonne of material per hour through 500m could generate about 1 kWh (assuming about 70% efficiency).

So to run a 200MWh generating plant you would need to move 200,000 tonnes of material an hour from your shelving system, load it onto your multiple elevators, and restack it on shelves at the other end.

Personally, I would rather have a big water big pipe, open a valve, and let gravity do the rest. Maybe I'm getting lazy as I get older :wink:
 
  • #5
Is it possible to construct elevators that can work for 2500 meters? Thus, in order to run a 1000 MWh generating plant, only 200,000 tonnes (i.e. 200 tons/MWh) of material would need to be moved every hour (assuming 70% efficiency ? -I wish others could confirm this or not, that is the only thing I want to know right now).
Compare this mass, with the mass of the water that is needed to drive a pumped-storage with a height difference of a 100 meters: it's 25 times less! (and probably about 50 times less in volume)

Also, forget "my shelving system" and loading onto elevators. Even simpler, for storing, stack those boxes on top of each other. For loading, hook them with the wire that is connected to the motor, in order to eliminate the need for an elevator ramp altogether.
But as I said, I am not an engineer and I cannot solve such problems. That's why I am asking questions here.. to resolve problems; not only to get older-lazy responses :frown:
 
  • #6
lfasn said:
Isn't it true that water evaporates from the upper reservoir of pumped-hydro systems?
Evaporation from a reservoir is very small effect in most temperate regions. Plus you also get the same rainfall into a pumped storage scheme that you would get into a normal reservoir.
 
  • #7
lfasn said:
Also, forget "my shelving system" and loading onto elevators. Even simpler, for storing, stack those boxes on top of each other. For loading, hook them with the wire that is connected to the motor, in order to eliminate the need for an elevator ramp altogether.

You don't seem to have any idea about what 200,000 tonnes of material actually looks like.

Suppose you used 1-meter cube metal blocks (let's say iron). Each block would weigh about 7 tonnes. 200,000 tonnes is about 28,500 blocks. It's your choice how you stack them. In round numbers, you could have a 30 x 30 x 30 cube (which would need some pretty strong foundations to stop it sinking into the ground!) or (probably more practical) a stack 100 blocks square x 3 meters high.

Now, you need to get those 28,500 blocks onto your elevator in 3,600 seconds. That's about 8 blocks per second. Hope your rope doesn't break...

Actually, if you DO find a way to do this, forget about the elevators. You could make a fortune out of a high-speed loading and unloading system for container ships. Unloading a shipload of 20,000 tonnes of containers onto a dock in just 6 minutes would a quite a neat trick.

That's why I am asking questions here.. to resolve problems; not only to get older-lazy responses :frown:

Well, YOU are the person who wants to design this system, not me :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Unloading a shipload of 20,000 tonnes of containers onto a dock in just 6 minutes would a quite a neat trick.
Ramming speed and a bit of poor steering should do the trick - of course clearign up the dock afterwards might take a while.
 

1. What is large scale energy storage?

Large scale energy storage refers to the process of storing large amounts of energy for later use. This can include storing electricity generated from renewable sources like solar and wind for use during times of high demand, or storing excess energy from traditional power plants.

2. Why is large scale energy storage important?

Large scale energy storage is important for several reasons. It helps to reduce reliance on fossil fuels by allowing for the storage of energy from renewable sources. It also helps to stabilize the grid by providing backup power during times of high demand or when there are disruptions in the energy supply.

3. What are some examples of large scale energy storage technologies?

Some examples of large scale energy storage technologies include pumped hydro storage, compressed air energy storage, and battery storage. Other emerging technologies include flywheel storage, thermal energy storage, and hydrogen storage.

4. What are the benefits of large scale energy storage?

The benefits of large scale energy storage include increased grid stability, improved integration of renewable energy sources, and cost savings. It also allows for more efficient use of existing energy infrastructure and can help to reduce carbon emissions.

5. What are the challenges of implementing large scale energy storage?

Some challenges of implementing large scale energy storage include high upfront costs, limited technology options, and regulatory barriers. Additionally, the storage of certain types of energy, such as renewable sources, can be difficult due to their intermittent nature. There may also be concerns about the environmental impact of certain storage technologies.

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • General Engineering
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top