Laser vs. Atmospherics: Exploring the Potential for Spontaneous Ignition

  • Thread starter Intuitive
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Laser
In summary, to ignite the air around a laser beam with a certain power level, one would need to use a laser with a specific frequency and intensity.
  • #1
Intuitive
270
0
Question.


If we had a tuned LASER, at what level of Energy would be required for a tuned LASER beam to spontaneously ignite the Air around its Beam just as a Bolt of Lightning ignites the Air around itself.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Intuitive said:
If we had a tuned LASER, at what level of Energy would be required for a tuned LASER beam to spontaneously ignite the Air around its Beam just as a Bolt of Lightning ignites the Air around itself.
A bolt of lightning does not ignite the air! A bolt of lightning ionizes the N2 and O2 molecules and atoms, and the recombination results in the formation of some NOx. The frequency of a laser would have to match the binding energy of N2 and/or O2, and perhaps one would need two lasers of different frequencies, and the intensity would determine the amount of molecules ionized.
 
  • #3
Astronuc said:
A bolt of lightning does not ignite the air! A bolt of lightning ionizes the N2 and O2 molecules and atoms, and the recombination results in the formation of some NOx. The frequency of a laser would have to match the binding energy of N2 and/or O2, and perhaps one would need two lasers of different frequencies, and the intensity would determine the amount of molecules ionized.

My Apologies Astronuc.

I used the word ignite because of the process

When exposed to oxygen, NO is converted into NO2. This conversion has been speculated as occurring via the ONOONO intermediate. In water, NO will react with oxygen and water to form HNO2. The reaction is thought to proceed via the following stoichiometry:

4 NO + O2 + 2 H2O → 4 HNO2

Which to me the entire process of ionizing the N2 and O2 to form NO and the rest of the chemical reaction to be a form of ignited cumbustion, I was taught that Lightning ignites the Air and that's where I used the term.

And thanks again for the useful information on the LASER.

I am working on a concept that uses a LASER that will emit through a highly reflective pipe that has an Inside diameter(ID) the same diameter as the LASER Beams width, The objective is to intensify the LASER Beam so that Air inside the Pipe evacuates by reaction although I don't believe a low power LASER can do the job even if properly tuned, That's why I wanted to know about the power level required to react with Air.

I wished to take this further for my own Linear LASER particle accelerator on a small scale.
 
  • #4
Intuitive said:
When exposed to oxygen, NO is converted into NO2. This conversion has been speculated as occurring via the ONOONO intermediate. In water, NO will react with oxygen and water to form HNO2. The reaction is thought to proceed via the following stoichiometry:

4 NO + O2 + 2 H2O → 4 HNO2

Which to me the entire process of ionizing the N2 and O2 to form NO and the rest of the chemical reaction to be a form of ignited cumbustion, I was taught that Lightning ignites the Air and that's where I used the term.

I am working on a concept that uses a LASER that will emit through a highly reflective pipe that has an Inside diameter(ID) the same diameter as the LASER Beams width, The objective is to intensify the LASER Beam so that Air inside the Pipe evacuates by reaction although I don't believe a low power LASER can do the job even if properly tuned, That's why I wanted to know about the power level required to react with Air.

I wished to take this further for my own Linear LASER particle accelerator on a small scale.
Interesting - a related concept was envisioned during the development of SDI (Star Wars).

In a pipe, I don't believe a significant vacuum would be achieved based on 4 NO + O2 + 2 H2O → 4 HNO2. The reduction in molecules from 7 to 4 would produce a reduction in pressure, but only upon cooling. During the laser pulse, with the dissociation, one would achieve a transient increase in pressure. Remember that the sound of thunder is due to a pressure wave expanding outward from the lightning bolt.

To determine the energy requirements, one needs to look at the number of moles of air (N2 and O2) that would have to be dissociated in the path (column) of the laser, and determine the energy and determine the pulse shape in order to determine the power.

[tex] E\,=\,\int\,P(t)\,dt[/tex]
 

1. What is the difference between laser and atmospheric ignition?

Laser ignition uses a focused beam of light to initiate a chemical reaction, while atmospheric ignition relies on the spontaneous combustion of a substance in the presence of oxygen in the air.

2. Which method is more efficient for starting a fire?

Laser ignition is generally considered to be more efficient, as it can target a specific area and requires less energy to initiate combustion compared to atmospheric ignition.

3. Can laser or atmospheric ignition be used for all types of materials?

While both methods can be used for a variety of materials, laser ignition is typically used for more precise and controlled reactions, while atmospheric ignition is more commonly used for materials that are prone to spontaneous combustion.

4. What are the potential safety concerns with laser and atmospheric ignition?

Laser ignition can pose a risk of eye damage if proper precautions are not taken, while atmospheric ignition can lead to unexpected and uncontrolled fires if the substance being ignited is not handled properly.

5. In what industries or applications are laser and atmospheric ignition commonly used?

Laser ignition has applications in fields such as aerospace, automotive, and military, while atmospheric ignition is commonly used in industries such as agriculture, mining, and waste management.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
128
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
280
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top