1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Laser Wavelengths

  1. Apr 15, 2007 #1
    Is this forum ok for posting EE student questions? I guess I'll find out. :biggrin:

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    How many photons per second does a low power (1 mW) He-Ne laser ([itex]\lambda=336[/itex]nm) emit?

    At what He-Ne laser power do you expect quantum effects to become important?

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I got the answer to the first part, [itex]1.7\times 10^{15} [/itex] photons/second.

    But the second part makes no sense to me. The book doesn't talk about lasers at all in this chapter or the ones before it. I looked HeNe lasers up on google, and I saw statements like these:

    So apparently, the power does not effect the wavelength! And so for the HeNe laser in the question, the wavelength will always be [itex]\lambda=336[/itex]nm. So how could changing the power possibly effect the wavelengths and hence the relavence of quantum effects? Is this a trick question?

  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 15, 2007 #2
    I don't think there is a quantitative answer to the second part of the question. Power is the rate at which energy is transferred. The quantum theory of light implies that light comes in particles (photons). If you are measuring some particular effect that occurs in a similar (or shorter) time than the time between photons arriving, then the effect will be erratic (i.e. statistical). For example, if you are measuring the heating of a block of material by the laser beam striking it, the heating requires a much greater time than that between individual photons arriving. Hence, the heating rate is "smooth" and there is no need to consider it a quantum effect. If, on the other hand, you are considering the promotion of an electron from the valence to the conduction band in a solar cell, the subsequent current will not be continuous if measured on a short enough time scale compared to the production rate of mobile electrons. Based on the question as stated, I suspect this is a little more detail than was intended but I believe this is the key point.
  4. Apr 15, 2007 #3
    Yeah, this seems strange. While I understand what you are saying, I have a feeling that is not what the book wants. This book has a crapload of typos, too. I wonder if the word "power" should have been "wavelength." In my google search I did see that they make HeNe lasers that produce light at different wavelengths.

    It's also the first question in the chapter, so it's most likely considered "easy."

    Also, since the TA doesn't speak english, I know he is just going to compare the answers to an answer sheet... so even if I give a good response based on your info, I probably won't get any points. :frown:

    The original question actually had some more in it, that I omitted. The actual paragraph after the quantitative (photon/second) part read like this:

    Since those two questions are in the same paragraph, it seems like they must both be talking about wavelength effects, not time effect.

    Arghgh. :grumpy:
  5. Apr 15, 2007 #4
    The radio frequency photon will have much less energy than an X-ray. Hence for a given amount of energy transmitted, there will be a much greater number of RF photons and so, less influence of quantum effects. But as far as a number as to where quantum effects are going to become important at, its not clear to me? Anybody else have an opinion?
  6. Apr 17, 2007 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You got me curious, so I looked in my old "Introduction to Modern Optics" text by Grand Fowles. He gives a table about the types/reagions of radiation. There are three types; "Wave" region (radio & microwaves), "Optical" region (infrared, visible, & ultraviolet), and "Ray" region (x-ray & gamma rays). They each have an associated quantum energy in electronvolt units.
  7. Apr 17, 2007 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    IMHO, A laser is fundamently a Quantum device. There is no point at which it "becomes" quantum, it is ALWAYS a quantum device. This is true regardless of power or wavelength.
  8. Apr 17, 2007 #7
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Laser Wavelengths
  1. Laser physics (Replies: 0)

  2. Lenses and lasers (Replies: 3)

  3. Is this a laser? (Replies: 3)