Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Latest UFO pic

  1. Jan 3, 2008 #1
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 3, 2008 #2
    I would like to know if anyone else saw it, multiple independant witnesses is the best way to confirm something like this. There should have been loads of people at the coast looking out to sea, the british coast is one of the most populated in the world, and i would be suspicious if it ws only him that saw it.

    Saying that, it definately fits the typical saucer stereotype. hmmm. i'm undecided.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2008
  4. Jan 3, 2008 #3

    DaveC426913

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Oh fer Pete's sake - it's a freakin' gull!

    Jumped right out at me...
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2008
  5. Jan 3, 2008 #4
    Might be a Gull, with motion blur from the camera. It looks like its much closer to shore then the ships.

    Plasma, he didnt say he saw it, only that he dicovered it on the photo after downloading it.
     
  6. Jan 3, 2008 #5

    turbo

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    My first thought, too, Dave. Flying left to right, wings blurred (more than the body) due to motion.
     
  7. Jan 3, 2008 #6

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It's a goshawk.
     
  8. Jan 3, 2008 #7
    I'd vote for sea gull too

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Jan 3, 2008 #8

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's a good one.
     
  10. Jan 3, 2008 #9
    hmmmmm, i'm decided...... Its a gull :smile:

    saying that, its a pretty damn fat gull if it is a bird. Amazing it can fly at all.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2008
  11. Jan 3, 2008 #10
    Agreed. Wonderful photograph.
     
  12. Jan 3, 2008 #11

    RonL

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I would have to agree with bird of some sort.

    Having looked at the returning NASA shuttle as it passed over between Austin and Waco texas, at around 10,000+ mph, you see a fireball and nothing on the shuttle is burning, just friction in action:bugeye:

    It will be a long time before i accept that anything can move thru our atmosphere without leaving some trace. -:)
     
  13. Jan 3, 2008 #12
    I wish I had it uploaded on my computer, but my brother took a nice picture in the desert in Nevada of some cloud formations which have been mistaken as UFO sightings many times in the past. So even cloud formations can dupe us.
     
  14. Jan 3, 2008 #13

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    This is telling:
    It's a sure bet he didn't see it either because it was a mundane object that he ignored without thinking (seagull - I agree that that is a very likely possibility) or that it is an artifact of some sort (dust/ bug on the lens, etc).
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2008
  15. Jan 3, 2008 #14

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Without eyewitnesses to corroborate the sighting or to provide explicit details about the object, and without any evidence that the object moved in an inexplicable manner, it is just another fuzzy photo that could be anything.
     
  16. Jan 3, 2008 #15

    DaveC426913

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    As far as fuzzy- photos-that-could-be-anything goes, this is a very poor example.:rolleyes: I would say that there is very little doubt that it's a bird.
     
  17. Jan 3, 2008 #16

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think we can guess that it might be a bird but only by playing the numbers. It is more likely to be a bird because not too many other things fly around. But a fuzzy photo is just a fuzzy photo. I think trying to make more of it is exactly what the UFO crowd gets slammed for doing.
     
  18. Jan 3, 2008 #17
    I spent a goodly amount of time with this photo with my photoshop program tonight. Without much work, you could clearly see the head of the bird.
     
  19. Jan 3, 2008 #18

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    But as you can see in the link, the ufo/flying saucer crowd likes to chalk such photos up as big wins, but they don't get to. We don't have to be sure that it's a bird to make it worth dropping, but we would have to be pretty sure that it's a flying saucer to pay more attention. That's the way burden of proof works with extrordinary claims.

    Still, as these things go, that's a pretty big wiff by the ufo/flying saucer crowd. How many big wiffs does it take before we can generally just ignore them?
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2008
  20. Jan 3, 2008 #19

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think it was actually two people quoted in a cheesy news story. If you choose to ignore everyone and the entire field because of stories like this, then you had better throw away your science books the next time someone proposes a perpetual motion machine. The logic is just as solid.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2008
  21. Jan 3, 2008 #20

    DaveC426913

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Well, it's just a report in a rag paper. I expect UFOers see it as giving them a bad name.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Latest UFO pic
  1. Ufo (Replies: 18)

  2. Latest on Dextercioby (Replies: 12)

  3. Astronomy pic (Replies: 18)

  4. Latest AZ UFO sighting (Replies: 2)

  5. The latest sociopath (Replies: 29)

Loading...