Laws of motion for new Lagrangian

  • I
  • Thread starter Maniac_XOX
  • Start date
  • #1
Maniac_XOX
86
5
TL;DR Summary
Is it possible to simplify this complicated equation??
$$\partial^\beta F_{\beta\alpha} +\partial^\beta A_\mu A^\mu \delta^\alpha_\sigma \delta^\rho_\beta+\mu^2 A_\alpha = 2A_\mu (\partial_\rho A^\rho) +\frac {4\pi}{c}J_\alpha$$
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2022 Award
10,335
11,088
You don't have the same free indices on each of your terms. There are three free indices on the second one on the left and you have a free ##\mu## instead of ##\alpha## in the first term on the right. Correct your typos and we may be able to help.
 
  • #3
Maniac_XOX
86
5
You don't have the same free indices on each of your terms. There are three free indices on the second one on the left and you have a free ##\mu## instead of ##\alpha## in the first term on the right. Correct your typos and we may be able to help.
Hmm you're right, the complicated part where i most def went wrong was finding the euler lagrange equation $$\partial^\beta \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial^\beta A^\alpha)}=\frac {\partial L}{\partial A^\alpha}$$
to the following section of the lagrangina i used: ##-\beta A_\mu A^\mu (\partial_\rho A^\rho)##

Need help finding the answer to this.

I found that $$\partial^\beta \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial^\beta A^\alpha)}=\partial^\beta(-\beta A_\mu A^\mu \delta^\alpha_\sigma \delta^\rho_\beta)$$

and also that $$\frac {\partial L}{\partial A^\alpha}= -2\beta A_\alpha (\partial_\rho A^\rho) $$

Could u help me out?
 
  • #4
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
20,004
10,656
I found that ∂β∂L∂(∂βAα)=∂β(−βAμAμδσαδβρ)
This is quite obviously wrong as you do not have the same free indices on both sides. Can you find your error and/or tell us how you arrive at this?
 
  • #5
Maniac_XOX
86
5
This is quite obviously wrong as you do not have the same free indices on both sides. Can you find your error and/or tell us how you arrive at this?
hello yeah i realized actually, I've come to the right equation being $$\partial^\beta(A_\mu A^\mu g_{\rho\sigma} \delta^\sigma_\beta \delta^\rho_\alpha)=(\partial_\rho A^\rho) g_{\mu\gamma} (\delta_\alpha^\gamma A^\mu + A^\gamma \delta^\mu_\alpha)$$ from euler lagrange $$\partial^\beta \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial^\beta A^\alpha)}=\frac {\partial L}{\partial A^\alpha}$$
When put inside the whole complete equation it becomes:
$$\partial^\beta F_{\beta\alpha} + \partial^\beta(A_\mu A^\mu g_{\rho\sigma} \delta^\sigma_\beta \delta^\rho_\alpha) + \mu^2 A_\alpha =(\partial_\rho A^\rho) g_{\mu\gamma} (\delta_\alpha^\gamma A^\mu + A^\gamma \delta^\mu_\alpha) + \frac {4\pi}{c} J_\alpha$$
Can you help me simplify this?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
20,004
10,656
I would start by using the summation properties of the Kronecker delta.
 
  • #7
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2022 Award
10,335
11,088
I'd move the ##g_{\mu\lambda}## inside the bracket before following Orodruin's advice.
 
  • #8
Maniac_XOX
86
5
I'd move the ##g_{\mu\lambda}## inside the bracket before following Orodruin's advice.
I would start by using the summation properties of the Kronecker delta.
Okay so I've tried lowering the indices on the right hand side and using the property $$g_{\mu\gamma}g^{\mu\nu}=\delta^\nu_\gamma$$
therefore on the right hand side I get
$$(\partial_\rho A^\rho) (\delta_\gamma^\nu \delta_\alpha^\gamma A_\nu + \delta_\gamma^\lambda \delta^\mu_\alpha A_\lambda) + \frac {4\pi}{c} J_\alpha$$
which should be able to simplify as:
$$(\partial_\rho A^\rho) (\delta_\alpha^\nu A_\nu + \delta_\gamma^\lambda \delta^\mu_\alpha A_\lambda) + \frac {4\pi}{c} J_\alpha$$

Is this correct? If so how do i go from there?
 
  • #9
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2022 Award
10,335
11,088
The point is that ##g_{\mu\gamma}\delta^\gamma_\alpha=g_{\mu\alpha}##.
 
  • #10
Maniac_XOX
86
5
The point is that ##g_{\mu\gamma}\delta^\gamma_\alpha=g_{\mu\alpha}##.
OH i get it, so i should be getting this$$\partial^\beta F_{\beta\alpha} + \partial^\beta(A_\mu A^\mu g_{\rho\beta} \delta^\rho_\alpha) + \mu^2 A_\alpha =(\partial_\rho A^\rho) (g_{\mu\alpha} A^\mu + g_{\gamma\alpha} A^\gamma) + \frac {4\pi}{c} J_\alpha$$which finally becomes$$\partial^\beta F_{\beta\alpha} + \partial^\beta(A_\mu A^\mu g_{\alpha\beta}) + \mu^2 A_\alpha = (A_\alpha + A_\alpha) + \frac {4\pi}{c} J_\alpha$$
so then the right hand side becomes ##2A_\alpha + \frac {4\pi}{c} J_\alpha## ?
 
  • #11
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2022 Award
10,335
11,088
You seem to have lost a ##\partial_\rho A^\rho## on the right hand side. Otherwise, yes.
 
  • #12
Maniac_XOX
86
5
You seem to have lost a ##\partial_\rho A^\rho## on the right hand side. Otherwise, yes.
Right i forgot that and also ##-\beta## factors on both sides while focusing on the other stuff. A question i have involving the LHS is:
Does ##\partial^\beta(-\beta \times g_{\alpha\beta}A_\mu A^\mu)##
mean the same as $$\frac {\partial (-\beta \times g_{\alpha\beta}A_\mu A^\mu)}{\partial A^\beta}$$ ? Cuz then wouldn't that bit simplify to ##-2\beta A_\alpha## as well?
 

Suggested for: Laws of motion for new Lagrangian

Replies
44
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
351
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
646
Replies
2
Views
395
Replies
15
Views
907
Replies
15
Views
817
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
766
Replies
29
Views
952
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
369
Top