Learning the harmonic oscilator

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of non-degeneracy in the harmonic oscillator problem in quantum mechanics. The speaker mentions the different approaches to solving the problem, including using the Schrodinger equation and using commutator relations. However, to prove the non-degeneracy of the eigenvectors, the {|x>} representation is necessary. This representation helps expose properties that imply the non-degeneracy of the Hamiltonian and its eigenvectors, and is equivalent to representing the Hilbert space in L2(R). It is also mentioned that in higher dimensions and with certain potential forms, degeneracy may occur.
  • #1
cire
I'm currently taking graduate classes toward my phD in physics... when I was undergraduate I learn the harmonic oscillator just solving the schrodinger equation with such potential can be derive that: E=(n+1/2)hw, the wave functions (with hermite polynomial *e^-x2). that take to pages of derivations only.

Now I'm taking QM at graduate level using the Cohen-Tannudji book, in this book the autors dedicate one chapter to the harmonic oscillator. they prove lemmas and deduce from [x,p]=ih => [a,a+]=1,...that E=(n+1/2)hw and the wave functions!

I really like that approach!, it is so elegant to get such results without using wave mechanics (solving the schrodinger equation)but

for proving that the eigenvectors are no degenerated they have to use the {|x>} representation for finding the ground state, and because the is only one solution it is not degenerated. why avoiding the {|x>} representation proving all those lemmas if you will have to used to prove the nondegeneracy of the eigenvector? Do you guys know how to prove that the eigenvalues are not degenarated without having to solve any equation?
thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There's a general theorem which states that in one dimension there are no degenerate bound states.

The theorem is most easily proved by contradiction.
 
  • #3
where I can find that proof?
 
  • #4
Proof

I think the proof goes like this:

Let 2 linearly independent solutions to the 1D Schrodinger equation be Ψ1 and Ψ2 .
Form the Wronskian W= Ψ1'Ψ2 - Ψ2'Ψ1. Since the 2 solutions are linearly independent, we can show by diffrentiating the Wronskian with respect to x and using the fact that the solutions must satisfy the Schrodinger equation, the Wronskian must be a nonzero constant, i.e. position independent. If one of the solutions repesents a bound state, then it tends to zero at infinity( let it be Ψ1) then at infinity we are left with Ψ1'Ψ2=constant, so we see no matter what the value Ψ1' takes at infinity (ofcourse it is finite) Ψ2 is not zero at infinity and hence does not correspond to a bound state. This leaves us with only one solution that is bound and hence one dimensional bound states cannot be degenerate.
 
  • #5
I mean a proof without using the schrodinger equation at all, using the schrodinger equation the harmonic oscillator is reduced to two pages of math, and as I said I following the logic of cohen-tanudji when everything is proved from the commutator relation and the norm being >=0
 
  • #6
Well, this proof involves only one line of maths, not more. We don't solve the Schrodinger equation here, we merely use it on the way. True when you solve the harmonic oscillator problem by solving the Schrodinger equation, things get complicated but we are not solving the equation. Besides this proof applies to any 1D problem. However I don't know a proof involving only the commutator relations.
 
  • #7
There is not other method to prove that the fundamental eigenstate of the Q harmonic oscillator hamiltonian is nondegenerate.U have to use the specific form of the annihilation operator.And just because u started in the coordinate representation,u'll have to use that representation as well.
Proving that the solution of the 1-st order LODE (implied by the spectral equation [itex] \hat{a}|0> = |0> [/itex]) is unique is achived only by giving the annihilation operator a certain representation,and,because the coordinate representation was the handy one,u chose that one.
The equation mentioned is not an abstract one.Not for the linear harmonic oscillator in QM.It is a specific model in which the Heisenberg unit algebra has a representation.U cannot prove the general nondegeneracy of the ground state of a general space of an irreductible representation of the unit Heisenberg algebra.It's just a particular vector (when generating the whole standard base by the Dirac-Fok method) and nothing more.

Daniel.
 
  • #8
thanks Daniel
 
  • #9
cire said:
... I really like that approach!, it is so elegant to get such results without using wave mechanics (solving the schrodinger equation)but

for proving that the eigenvectors are no degenerated they have to use the {|x>} representation for finding the ground state ...
Up until that point, only certain aspects of the X and P operators had been exploited, and in order to go the last step, it became necessary to exploit two more properties. These properties serve to DEFINE the Hilbert space within which the operators a and a are said to act. Specifically, we want to invoke the properties that X itself is nondegenerate in that space, and its eigenkets {|x>} span the entire space (... and likewise for P). This itself is equivalent to saying that the Hilbert space can be represented by L2(R) relative to the {|x>} (or {|p>}) basis. Thus, by going into the {|x>} (or {|p>}) representation, we have a very appropriate setting within which to expose and exploit the said properties. Once exposed, these properties imply that the Hamiltonian itself, too, is nondegenerate and its eigenvectors form a basis of the Hilbert space in question.
 
  • #10
Since H doesn't commute with x, p or any combination of them it is clear that any complete set of commuting observables will have only one operator, and therefore it's eigenstates will be non-degenerate.

In higher dimensions with potential linear in the square of the radius we would have degeneracies because L^2 and Lz would commute with H. Note that in one dimension and with coulombian potential we don't have degeneracy.
 

1. What is a harmonic oscillator?

A harmonic oscillator is a system that can oscillate or vibrate back and forth around an equilibrium point, following a specific pattern called a harmonic motion. This type of motion is characterized by a restoring force that is directly proportional to the displacement from the equilibrium point.

2. What are some real-world examples of a harmonic oscillator?

Some common examples of a harmonic oscillator include a pendulum, a mass attached to a spring, a swinging door, and a guitar string. These systems exhibit harmonic motion due to the presence of a restoring force, such as gravity or the elasticity of the spring.

3. How is a harmonic oscillator described mathematically?

A harmonic oscillator can be described using a differential equation known as the harmonic oscillator equation, which is represented as F = -kx, where F is the restoring force, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement from the equilibrium point. This equation can be used to model the motion of a harmonic oscillator using calculus.

4. What is the period of a harmonic oscillator?

The period of a harmonic oscillator is the time it takes for one complete cycle of oscillation or vibration. It is dependent on the mass and spring constant of the system and can be calculated using the equation T = 2π√(m/k), where T is the period, m is the mass, and k is the spring constant.

5. How can I apply the concept of a harmonic oscillator in my research or experiments?

The concept of a harmonic oscillator is widely applicable in various fields of science and engineering, such as physics, chemistry, and biology. It can be used to study the behavior of different systems, analyze data, and make predictions. Understanding the principles of a harmonic oscillator can also help in designing and optimizing systems for specific purposes, such as creating accurate timekeeping devices or designing stable structures.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
702
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
718
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
844
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
169
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top