Consider a function [itex]f(x)[/itex] and its inverse [itex]g(x)[/itex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Then [itex](f \circ g)(x) = x [/itex] and [itex](g \circ f)(x) = x[/itex]

Are both these statements separate requirements in order for the inverse to be defined? Is it possible that one of the above statements is true but not the other? If so, could I see an example of such a case?

Otherwise, could you prove one having knowledge of the other?

Thanks!

BiP

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Left Inverse vs Right Inverse

Loading...

Similar Threads for Left Inverse Right | Date |
---|---|

A Differential operator, inverse thereof | Jan 9, 2018 |

[itex]s(t)=\int_{t_0}^{t}\left | R'(\xi) \right |d\xi[/itex] What is [itex]\xi[/itex] | Sep 29, 2012 |

*s(t)*=$\int_{t_0}^{t}\left | R'(\xi) \right | d\xi$ What is $\xi$ ? | Sep 29, 2012 |

Why we take right hand and left hand limit | Dec 3, 2011 |

Proving that left limit for a function exists | Apr 3, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**