The Leibniz rule:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

1. Let f(x,y) be a continuous two variable real function defined on (closed intervals) {x0, x1} x {y0, y1}.

2. Let f_1 (partial derivative of f with respect to the first variable) exists and be continuous on the same subset of RxR.

3. Let F be defined as F(x) = (int) (lim x = y0, x = y1) f(x,y)dy

Then F' exists and F'(x) = (int) (lim x = y0, x = y1) f_1(x,y)dy.

I know and understand the proof that uses the Mean Value Theorem of elementary calculus. Yet in Wikipedia (Leibniz's rule: derivatives and integrals) they use a simpler proof. They arrived to this point, which I understood:

F'(y) = lim (h->0) (int)(lim x=c, x=d) ( f(x+h, y) - f(x,y)) dy

h

BUt then they say: "... and using uniform continuity the right hand side equals to

(int) (lim x=c, x=d) f_1(x,y)dy."

How do they manage to use uniform continuity to introduce the limit inside the integral ????

Thanks.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Leibniz Rule (derivative of an integral)

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Leibniz Rule derivative |
---|

B Function rules question |

I Derivative and Parameterisation of a Contour Integral |

B Product rule OR Partial differentiation |

Demystifying the Chain Rule in Calculus - Comments |

B Proof of quotient rule using Leibniz differentials |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**