Integrating Without a Calculator: Finding Length of Curve

In summary: I'm trying to get the hang of it.Well, since you already did the full problem, my idea was to use the fact that y is a circle of radius 2, centered at (0,0) , and that (1,√3) is a point corresponding to π/3 radians (easier to see after normalizing by dividing each term by 2 ), and (0,2) corresponds to π/2 radians (there is some ambiguity on wether for x=0 we choose y=2 , or y=-2 ). The length of an arc of (π/2 -π/3) radians in a circle of radius 2 is 2(π/
  • #1
whatlifeforme
219
0

Homework Statement


Find the length of the curve between x=0 and x=1. Note: can this be done without a calculator?

Homework Equations


y = sqrt(4-x^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



x=2sin∅
dx = 2cos∅ d∅ sqrt(4-4(sin∅)^2) ---> 2cos∅integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+(-2sin∅)^2)

integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+4(sin∅)^2) (How do i integrate this without using a calculator?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
whatlifeforme said:

Homework Statement


Find the length of the curve. Note: can this be done without a calculator?


Homework Equations


y = sqrt(4-x^2)



The Attempt at a Solution



x=2sin∅
dx = 2cos∅ d∅


sqrt(4-4(sin∅)^2) ---> 2cos∅


integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+(-2sin∅)^2)

integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+4(sin∅)^2) (How do i integrate this without using a calculator?)

The length of a non-parametrized curve such as yours is given by :

##L = \int_{a}^{b} \sqrt{1 + (f')^2} dx ##

Where f' is the derivative of your function with respect to whatever variable it may be.
 
  • #3
@whatlifeforme: It's too early to think about a substitution before you have the integral set up correctly, as Zondrina points out. Also, where did you get your limits of 0 to 1?
 
  • #4
LCKurtz said:
@whatlifeforme: It's too early to think about a substitution before you have the integral set up correctly, as Zondrina points out. Also, where did you get your limits of 0 to 1?

sorry. it should say Find the length of the curve between x=0 and x=1. .
 
  • #5
is this correct integral for arc length?

integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+4(sin∅)^2)or does this one look correct?

integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+1/(4*(4-x^2))either way, they both look hard to integrate.
 
  • #6
hi whatlifeforme! :smile:

i haven't followed what you've done

start again, writing everything out carefully :wink:
 
  • #7
whatlifeforme said:
is this correct integral for arc length?

integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+4(sin∅)^2)


or does this one look correct?

integral (0 to 1) sqrt(1+1/(4*(4-x^2))


either way, they both look hard to integrate.

Use the formula I gave you... it really shouldn't be to difficult to compute this.
 
  • #8
so starting over:
find the length of the curve from x=0 to x=1.

y=sqrt(4-x^2)

arc length formula.
[itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1 {\sqrt{1+F'(x)^2} dx} [/itex]
[itex]\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{4-x^2}} * -2x [/itex]

[itex]\frac{dy^2}{dx^2} = \frac{x^2}{4-x^2}[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1 {\sqrt{1+[(x^2)/(4-x^2)]} dx}[/itex]


does this look correct so far, any tips to go from here?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Sure. What are you waiting for? Simplify it.
 
  • #10
LCKurtz said:
Sure. What are you waiting for? Simplify it.

how? common denominator?

[itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1 {\sqrt{1+[(x^2)/(4-x^2)]} dx}[/itex]


[itex]\sqrt{\frac{4-x^2+x^2}{4-x^2}}[/itex]

[itex]\sqrt{\frac{4}{4-x^2}}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{2}{\sqrt{4-x^2}}[/itex]

[itex]2\displaystyle\int_0^1 {\frac{dx}{\sqrt{4-x^2}}} [/itex]

2arcsin(x/2)][itex]^{1}_{0}[/itex]

2(∏/6) - 2(0) = ∏/3
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Use the trig substitution x=2sinθ when you get [itex]\int \frac{4}{\sqrt{4-x^2}}dx[/itex]
 
  • #12
iRaid said:
Use the trig substitution x=2sinθ when you get [itex]\int \frac{4}{\sqrt{4-x^2}}dx[/itex]
that would be the same as recognizing that it is the derivative of arcsin. however, if you were to do the substitution you would still end with the values i have, correct?
 
  • #13
Yes, but 2(∏/6) - 2(0) isn't equal to ∏/2. Typo?
 
  • #14
How about squaring both sides of the original :

y=[itex]{\sqrt{4-x^2}}[/itex] to see what curve y is ?
 
  • #15
Dick said:
Yes, but 2(∏/6) - 2(0) isn't equal to ∏/2. Typo?

sorry. fixed. it's ∏/3.
 
  • #16
whatlifeforme said:
sorry. fixed. it's ∏/3.

Then it's correct. Nice TeX by the way.
 
  • #17
Dick said:
Then it's correct. Nice TeX by the way.

thanks. I'm trying to get the hang of it.
 
  • #18
Well, since you already did the full problem, my idea was to use the fact that y is a circle of radius 2, centered at (0,0) , and that (1,√3) is a point corresponding to π/3 radians (easier to see after normalizing by dividing each term by 2 ), and (0,2) corresponds to π/2 radians (there is some ambiguity on wether for x=0 we choose y=2 , or y=-2 ). The length of an arc of (π/2 -π/3) radians in a circle of radius 2 is 2(π/2 -π/3) = π/3 .
 
  • #19
Bacle2 said:
How about squaring both sides of the original :

y=[itex]{\sqrt{4-x^2}}[/itex]


to see what curve y is ?

:biggrin:
 

1. What is meant by "integrating without a calculator"?

"Integrating without a calculator" refers to the process of finding the area under a curve without using a calculator or any other electronic tool. This can be done manually using integration techniques such as the Riemann sum or the trapezoidal rule.

2. What is the significance of finding the length of a curve?

The length of a curve is an important concept in mathematics and physics, as it allows us to calculate the distance traveled by an object or the area enclosed by a curve. It is also used in various real-world applications, such as calculating the length of a road or the perimeter of a complex shape.

3. What are the steps involved in integrating without a calculator to find the length of a curve?

The steps involved in integrating without a calculator to find the length of a curve include: 1) determining the function that represents the curve, 2) finding the derivative of the function, 3) setting up the integral to find the arc length, 4) solving the integral using integration techniques, and 5) evaluating the integral to find the length of the curve.

4. Can integrating without a calculator be used for any type of curve?

Yes, integrating without a calculator can be used for any type of curve as long as the function that represents the curve is known. This method can be used for both simple and complex curves, as long as the integral can be set up and solved.

5. What are the advantages of integrating without a calculator to find the length of a curve?

Integrating without a calculator allows for a deeper understanding of the concept of integration and the relationship between the derivative and the integral. It also allows for more accurate results compared to using a calculator, as the integrals are solved manually. Additionally, it can be a useful skill to have in situations where a calculator is not available or reliable.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
438
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
241
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
266
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
582
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
454
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
388
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
1K
Back
Top