1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Lens equation

  1. Apr 30, 2005 #1
    Hi Peaple :!!)

    How do you determine the minimum distance p+q between the object and image for given focal length given

    1/p + 1/q = 1/f

    this may seem trivial, but i cant figure it out.
    any tips please

    Callisto
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 30, 2005 #2
    Arent p and q distances....? Just add them.
     
  4. Apr 30, 2005 #3
    If your saying given a fixed focal length, find the relationship between p and q, that case

    [tex] \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = k [/tex]

    Solve it for either p or q (the result is the same) and graph it. I believe its a logarithmic relation, but I'm not sure.
     
  5. Apr 30, 2005 #4

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    What math tools do you have at your disposal?

    Actually the thin lens relationship is a hyperbola.
     
  6. Apr 30, 2005 #5
    I should know that, my brother did a presentation on it a week ago.
     
  7. Apr 30, 2005 #6
    solving 1/p+1/p=1/f for p
    i get
    -qf/(f-q)
    now i substitute this into p+q, then i get -q^2/(f-q).
    now if i use calculus to find the minimum value i differentiate -q^2/(f-q) and let it equal zero so
    d/dq= -q(2f-q)/(f-q)^2 =0 when q = 0 or 2f

    Repeating this process for p then p = 0 or 2f
    so the minimum distance is
    p+q=4f. why is it not zero

    am i completly wrong?any comments.

    Callisto
     
  8. May 1, 2005 #7
    Looks fine to me. You might want to check that 2f is a minimum (not a maximum or point of inflection), to be thorough. Looking at the lens equation itself do you see why the 0 solutions are inadmissible?
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2005
  9. May 1, 2005 #8
    1/0+1/0=0 , 0 doesn't = 1/f
    therefore 0's are excluded from the problem, correct?
    Callisto
     
  10. May 1, 2005 #9
    1/0 + 1/0 is 0? Are you sure?
     
  11. May 1, 2005 #10
    1/0+1/0=1/0, 1/0 doesn't = 1/f
    is this why 0's are excluded?
     
  12. May 1, 2005 #11
    1/0 is undefined, as is 1/0+1/0, and no other arithmetic with these quantities is defined either, so if p or q were 0, you could not rearrange the equation the way that you did (without first defining a new arthmetic). In order for the lens equation to make sense with usual definitions, the assumption p, q not zero must be made.
     
  13. May 1, 2005 #12
    Thanks
    2f must be minimum since if the object p is at infinity then 1/p=0 so q = f for an object at infinity.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Lens equation
  1. An equation (Replies: 8)

  2. Simultaneous equations (Replies: 7)

Loading...