Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Lenz's Law, 2nd opinion wanted

  1. Apr 5, 2004 #1
    Please look for flaws in my reasoning, any help would be appreciated.
    HRW CH31 #28P(if you have the book handy)
    A long rectangular conducting loop of width L, resistance R, and mass m, is hung in a horizontal, uniform magnetic field B that is directed into the page and exists only above line aa. The loop is then dropped; during its fall, it accelerates until it reaches a certain terminal speed. Ignoring air resistance, what is this terminal speed?
    For the falling loop to reach a constant terminal speed the force of gravity pulling it downward must be cancelled by a Lorentz Force pullint it upward

    F(Lorentz)=mg eqn 1

    To find F(L) we must first find the induce EMF, then the induced current and finally use this to determine F(L).

    Magnetic Flux:(MF)=Integral[B*dot*dA] Let x equal verticle length of loop in B field.


    Now taking the derivative of both sides with respect to t:

    intergrate both sides with respect to t:
    This sounds reasonable because EMF should be increasing with time since change of flux is increasing with time.

    Now in terms of current:

    and Force:

    Subbing g for a and rewriting eqn 1 from way above:

    solving for t:

    Using kinematics equation:

    Sound Plausible? Thanks for your time.
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 5, 2004 #2
    Here, I think, is a problem:

    (You could have saved yourself some time by simply claiming that v = at, which in effect is what you have done.)

    Problem is you are assuming that a is constant. I think you will agree that this is the case here. The magnetic force exerted on the coil is increasing as v increases.

    In fact, if you just remember that you are looking for a terminal velocity, it will be obvious that ai=g, and af=0.
  4. Apr 6, 2004 #3
    Ahhh :rolleyes: , thanks for pointing that out; I sensed a bit of redundancy(sp?), but wasn't sure enough to simplify. Then again, I can use the practice showing relationships via Calculus.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook