1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Let m be a natural number

  1. Jul 16, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Let m be a natural number. Find the flaw in the statement below. Explain why the statement is not valid, and change one symbol to correct it.

    "If T is a set of natural numbers such that 1) m [tex]\in[/tex] T and 2) n [tex]\in[/tex] T implies n+1 [tex]\in[/tex] T, then T = {n [tex]\in[/tex] N : n ≥ m}
    2. Relevant equations

    Dunno.

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Part 2) of the if statement tells us that T is an infinite set. I'm not sure exactly how 1) and 2) are connected. Hmmmm ...

    Help me get started.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 16, 2010 #2

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    To get started think about this. Is m-1 in T?
     
  4. Jul 16, 2010 #3
    Hmmm ...

    T is going to look something like {k, k+1, k+2, ...}, where k≥1 is an integer. That's basically what the second condition tells me.

    m is some element in T. That's all I know about m. Could m-1 be in T? As long as m>k.
     
  5. Jul 16, 2010 #4

    Office_Shredder

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    So is their equation for T correct?
     
  6. Jul 16, 2010 #5

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Ok, so you don't know if m-1 is in T. On the other hand, m-1 is definitely NOT in [m,infinity). That suggests that T and [m,infinity) are not necessarily the same thing.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: Let m be a natural number
Loading...