Lets talk Turbines

  • Thread starter willib
  • Start date
  • #1
227
0
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
FredGarvin
Science Advisor
5,067
10
Jet engines have a thrust horsepower calculation, but I don't think it could be held applicable in this case. The rule is at 375 mph, 1 Lbf of thrust is equal to 1 HP.
 
  • #3
227
0
These Wren turbines are just under three inches in diameter..
very cool stuff..
 
  • #4
Q_Goest
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,001
39
Hey Fred, that works out, because if you say an aircraft is flying at 375 mph and that aircraft requires 1 lbf of thrust to keep it going at that speed, the power (force times distance per unit time) works out to 1 hp. But that's an arbitrary velocity. If the aircraft has more resistance, and can only fly at 100 mph with the same engine, then the equation results in a power output of 0.2667 hp. And if it's zipping along at 1000 mph, the power output becomes 2.667 hp.

So there doesn't seem to be a correlation between hp and thrust. But there should be since the power actually equates to energy in (ie: energy burned in the engine).

I always wondered about this one, how can you equate thrust to hp? Perhaps because it's "static thrust" one must be able to get a "thrust curve" which is analogous to a pressure curve on a centrifugal pump, along with an efficiency.

There has to be more to it than simply thrust at 375 mph equates to a given hp.
 
  • #5
FredGarvin
Science Advisor
5,067
10
Q_Goest said:
Hey Fred, that works out, because if you say an aircraft is flying at 375 mph and that aircraft requires 1 lbf of thrust to keep it going at that speed, the power (force times distance per unit time) works out to 1 hp. But that's an arbitrary velocity. If the aircraft has more resistance, and can only fly at 100 mph with the same engine, then the equation results in a power output of 0.2667 hp. And if it's zipping along at 1000 mph, the power output becomes 2.667 hp.

So there doesn't seem to be a correlation between hp and thrust. But there should be since the power actually equates to energy in (ie: energy burned in the engine).

I always wondered about this one, how can you equate thrust to hp? Perhaps because it's "static thrust" one must be able to get a "thrust curve" which is analogous to a pressure curve on a centrifugal pump, along with an efficiency.

There has to be more to it than simply thrust at 375 mph equates to a given hp.

You do bring up good points. Personally I have NEVER expressed a thrust producing engine in terms of horsepower. It is always in thrust. For some (unknown to me) reason there is a small need to express HP in this fashion. The relationship [tex] THP = \frac{F_n * MPH}{375}[/tex] is actually from a Pratt and Whitney reference I have. It is the only reference I have that even states it. What it's method of derivation is I really do not know.
 
  • #6
227
0
Oops my mistake..
please disregard..
 
  • #7
Danger
Gold Member
9,647
252
FredGarvin said:
The relationship [tex] THP = \frac{F_n * MPH}{375}[/tex] is actually from a Pratt and Whitney reference I have. It is the only reference I have that even states it. What it's method of derivation is I really do not know.
As I understand it, hp:thrust ratio depends on not only speed, but also altitude. I assume that it has something to do with factoring in air resistance.
It always bugs me that a full-throttle jet bolted to a test stand produces zero horesepower.
 

Related Threads on Lets talk Turbines

  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
22K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Top