Hey guys, first year university math student here. I need some help explaining the proof used in the scripts I'm studying from - just part of the proof to be more precise. English isn't my first language and I don't have much experience writing/rewriting down proofs and I don't know how to write those nice latex symbols, so sorry in advance if something doesn't make sense:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Presuming:

(1), a is element of R (|a| =/= +oo)

(2), f and g are real functions

(3), limit x->a_+ (f'(x) / g'(x)) exists (must be element of R, or +-oo)

(4), limit x->a_+ (f(x)) = limit x->a_+ (g(x)) = 0

then

limit x->a_+ (f(x))/(g(x)) = limit x->a_+ (f'(x))/(g'(x))

I think I understand most of the proof but there's something right at the start that I'm completely stuck at and still don't understand precisely enough:

Let L=limit x->a_+ (f'(x) / g'(x)).

There exists delta>0, such that for all x element of (a,a+delta), f and g are both defined on this interval,

- I think this can be proved easily from (4), correct? Also, |f| and |g| are both smaller than some Epsilon>0. The following however, I don't understand at all:

and both f' and g' have a finite (not = oo or -oo) derivation on this interval, and also g'=/=0.

Why is the derivation necessarily finite?

EDIT:

To explain where I see the problem a bit more precisely, let's say:

L=0

f(x)=0 for all x element R, and therefore f'(x)=0 for all x element R

Now, from limit x->a_+ (f'(x) / g'(x)) = 0 , it should be possible to somehow prove, that there exists a delta>0, such that for all x element (a,a+delta), g'(x) is finite and non zero. I really don't see it though, why can g'(x) not be +oo somewhere in that interval?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# L'Hospital proof problem

Loading...

Similar Threads - L'Hospital proof problem | Date |
---|---|

B Applying L'Hospital's rule to Integration as the limit of a sum | Mar 5, 2017 |

I L'Hospital's rule for Laplacian | Jul 25, 2016 |

L'Hospital's rule (products) | Jun 16, 2015 |

Proof of L'Hospital's Rule | Feb 27, 2010 |

A Kinder, Gentler, Longer L'Hospital Proof | Feb 9, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**