I'm working thru Thirring's Classical Mathematical Physics. The lie derivative is defined and used on a vector field. I.e. L(x)f where x is a vector field. () = subscript(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

However, later on, he uses the lie derivative of the hamiltonian, which is a scalar function. I.e. L(H)f () = subscript

I'm assuming that this means the vector field induced by the hamiltonian, and not the lie derivative in the direction of the hamiltonian itself. However, usually Thirring is careful to call out this distinction (i.e. notating X(H) as the vector field induced by the hamiltonian).

My question: is it possible to have a lie derivative in the direction of a scalar function?

thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Lie derivative clarification

Loading...

Similar Threads - derivative clarification | Date |
---|---|

I What is the covariant derivative of the position vector? | Feb 18, 2018 |

I Lie derivative of a metric determinant | Dec 22, 2017 |

I Covariant derivative of Ricci scalar causing me grief! | Nov 26, 2017 |

A Covariant derivative only for tensor | Sep 23, 2017 |

Clarification on Lie Derivatives | Oct 28, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**