Life evolving on a planet revolving a red dwarf?

  • Thread starter Gold Barz
  • Start date
  • #1
Gold Barz
467
0
Could it happen or is it very unlikely?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,881
10
Well I would think the most intense frequency band from a red dwarf would be suilable for photosynthesis, since it uses photons in the deep red frequency band. The planet would have to be in a very special orbit, since the habitable zone would be much narrower than that for a G-type like the Sun.

The free energy gap between the incoming radiation from the star and the outgoing infrared of the heated planet would be much narrower too, which would suggest only simple life. Of course if the planet had live tectonics and midocean rifts to supply free energy, all bets are off.
 
  • #3
Gold Barz
467
0
So do you think these planets are out there in the galaxy, many of them?

Also, there is another question in the PM I sent you...thanks.
 
  • #4
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,881
10
As I replied in the PM, I think these planets would be extemely rare. And I'm talking about planets with some bacteria, not comfortable planets for humans.
 
  • #5
Danger
Gold Member
9,756
253
It seems to me that there are very few conditions under which life can't develop. To start with, nothing is said about the basis of that life. It could use a sulphur metabolism, or be silicon based, or maybe even a plasma field with a coherent internal 'neurology' based upon charge exchanges. Just looking at Earth, who would suspect that one lifeform evolved living on the brink of undersea volcanic vents or that some lichen thingie is happy at subzero temperatures with no air? The life span of a red dwarf is so long that trillions of experimental attempts by random molecules to join into 'life' can take place. It's entirely possible that at least one of them is viable.
 
  • #6
Gold Barz
467
0
So, life is against all odds then in the galaxy because...red dwarfs make up like 4 out of 5 planets in the galaxy and 60% of the stars are in binary systems.
 
  • #7
turbo
Gold Member
3,228
55
Gold Barz said:
So, life is against all odds then in the galaxy because...red dwarfs make up like 4 out of 5 planets in the galaxy and 60% of the stars are in binary systems.
There is life on Earth, and there has been for about 75% of its existence.

A red dwarf might have a smaller habitable zone, but a long quiescent lifetime might allow life to arise and develop at a rate similar to, or perhaps superior to, the emergence of life around our own star, adjusted for the lifetime of the star.
 
  • #8
Gold Barz
467
0
But if it has a very narrow habitable zone then it could last for gazillions of years and still not have life evolve because there is no planet in that narrow habitable zone.
 

Suggested for: Life evolving on a planet revolving a red dwarf?

Replies
2
Views
131
Replies
0
Views
503
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
777
Replies
5
Views
628
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
682
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Top