Life Improbable In 4D+ Universes

  • Thread starter Gold Barz
  • Start date

Answers and Replies

  • #2
JesseM
Science Advisor
8,496
12
http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/patricia/exp3a.html [Broken] explains that gravitational waves need at least three dimensions (two dimensions to oscillate in, and one to travel in), so in a universe with two spatial dimensions there could be no so gravitational waves, which means that "curvature in 2+1 spacetime dimensions can only exist locally in regions where matter is present. I.e that means that for the example of a single point mass, the spacetime everywhere around the mass will be flat according to the Einstein equations." So, this backs up the statement on the page you linked to that "At least for FEWER than 4 dimensions on the large scale, that is 1 dimension of time, and 2 dimensions of space, it can be shown from general relativity that in such 'universes' the force of gravity does not exist in a vacuum. It cannot extend outside a body and cause other bodies to feel its effects."

As for the statement that more than three dimensions would also make life almost impossible because planets could no longer have stable orbits, this is confirmed by something written by Stephen Hawking on http://www.hawking.org.uk/text/physics/quantum.html [Broken]:
On the other hand, four or more spatial dimensions would mean that gravitational and electric forces would fall off faster than the inverse square law. In this situation, planets would not have stable orbits around their star, nor electrons have stable orbits around the nucleus of an atom. Thus intelligent life, at least as we know it, could exist only in four dimensions. I very much doubt we will find a non anthropic explanation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
462
0
So....it is improbable for life to arise in 4D+ universes...wow, that sucks majorly
 
  • #4
453
0
In Greg Egan's "Diaspora" he describes in detail a 5 dimensional Star with a “rotational pole” described as a single 2-sphere on the star's 4-dimensional hypersurface that stays fixed in space as the star rotates. in the book very complex life evolved in this polar region: http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/DIASPORA/17/17.html

very speculative [it IS scifi after all- even if well thought-out and reasonable] and quite fascinating!
 
  • #5
462
0
I still dont see why it is impossible, wouldnt a 5D universe have different laws than a 3D universe does? why do we apply our laws to their laws?
 
  • #6
Garth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,574
105
In a 5D (4D + time) universe Newtonian gravity would be proportional to
r-3 not r-2 and gravitational orbits would be unstable, they would decay. Therefore no galaxy, no star, no planets and no life!

Garth
 
  • #7
JesseM
Science Advisor
8,496
12
Gold Barz said:
I still dont see why it is impossible, wouldnt a 5D universe have different laws than a 3D universe does? why do we apply our laws to their laws?
They are assuming a universe with the same basic laws but just a different number of spatial dimensions. So yes, if you come up with totally different laws you might be able to imagine a 5D universe where life is possible.
 
  • #8
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
7
If the 5th dimension is assumed compacted, this problem goes away.
 
  • #9
ohwilleke
Gold Member
1,513
415
Gold Barz said:
So....it is improbable for life to arise in 4D+ universes...wow, that sucks majorly
Somehow, I feel a strong inclination to bet that life occassionally arises in 4D anyway.
 
  • #10
462
0
"So yes, if you come up with totally different laws you might be able to imagine a 5D universe where life is possible."

Yes I am assuming that the laws would either be tweaked or completely different in a 5D universe

And maybe a 5D's universe life isnt the same as our life a 3D/4D life...I know it sounds stupid but what if it isnt something we can even begin to fathom...like some weird non-organic life
 
  • #11
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
738
That assumes higher order dimensional universes exist. It they do, so be it. Do they have observational consequences in this universe? I seriously doubt that. Let's try to reign in our observations to this universe.
 
  • #12
462
0
Well...yeah, were assuming, we have no way of testing them or testing the theory that states them...I am just fascinated by other dimensional universes

Chronos did you get my last PM?
 

Related Threads on Life Improbable In 4D+ Universes

  • Last Post
4
Replies
91
Views
18K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
62
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
8K
Top