Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Light-cone coordinates

  1. Jan 2, 2010 #1
    Hi, my question stems from Zwiebach's book - A First Course in String Theory, in specific, the chapter on "special relativity and extra dimensions".

    He introduces light-cone coordinates as follows:

    x+ = 1/sqrt(2) (x0 + x1) ....... (1)
    x- = 1/sqrt(2) (x0 - x1) ........ (2)

    Here x^mu = (x0, x1) = (ct, x)

    He goes on to say that:

    "For a beam of light moving in the positive x1 direction, we have x1 = ct = x0, and
    thus x− = 0. The line x− = 0 is, by definition, the x+ axis. For a beam of light
    moving in the negative x1 direction, we have x1 = −ct = −x0, and thus x+ = 0. This
    corresponds to the x− axis. The x± axes are lines at 45◦ with respect to the x0, x1 axes."

    What I don't understand is that in his explanation, it looks like he is treating equations (1) and (2) as purely scalar equations e.g. for the x1 = ct = x0 case, we get x- = 0 from eq (2). But then again, (1) and (2) cannot represent a coordinate system as there is no inherent directionality presented - these are just scalar quantities. So I begin to think that (1) and (2) should be representing unit vector quantities (note the 1/sqrt(2)). In this case you cannot follow his argument and get x- = 0 by setting x1 = ct = x0. It will instead result in a non-zero vector.

    I am confused as to the logic steps he is taking here - scalars or vectors....

    Any help most appreciated.

    V.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Light-cone coordinates
  1. Light Cone (Replies: 5)

  2. Light Cone (Replies: 1)

  3. Light Cones (Replies: 5)

  4. Light Cone Coordinates (Replies: 1)

Loading...