1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Light: Goemetric Optics

  1. May 31, 2003 #1


    User Avatar


    I have 2 problems that I need some help with, plz.

    1) How far from a 50mm focal length lens, such as used in many 35mm cameras, must an object be positioned if it is so to form a real image magnified by a factor of 3?

    how do i solve for this? I have tried to solve using lens equation but not the answer I would expect, my answer is 52mm. Is this correct if not how did you go about solving for this?

    2) A biconvex lens is formed by using a piece of plastic(n=170). the radius of the front surface is 20cm and the radius of the back surface is 30cm. what is the focal length of the lens?

    I know that r/2 = f but should i add both radius's and use that /2? I need some help?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 1, 2003 #2
    Hi Dx,

    1) Sorry I can't reproduce your answer. What equation did you use, and what values did you plug in?
    Anyway I think it's a strange question since in most cases a camera image will be much smaller than the object.

    2) I think r/2=f can't be the correct equation since the refractive index n doesn't appear in it. Plus I doubt that the value n = 170 is correct. You would rather expect n to be in the range between n=1 and n=2. As for a biconvex lens, you should add the inverses of both focal lengths to get the inverse focal length, i.e. 1/f = 1/f1 + 1/f2.
  4. Jun 1, 2003 #3


    User Avatar

    My equation used was 1/do + 1/di = 1/f, since my f lenth is 1/50mm i tried to solve for do. Unless i am incorrect i believe that do and f are the same distance, right? thats how i solved for it using substitution. But the factor of 3 forlateral magnification, right?
    m=+3, so di=m*do = 20cm. Sorry I dont have all my notes but i am trying to remember all my steps, i substituted the do answer to get 1/do - 1/f to get my answer. I am starting to think im really confused here. Yes! Its a very strange question i think not enough info i though at first but my teacher sasy theres enough to solve. Im gonna keep trying anyways...thanks!

    I think for the particular problem its refractive index n = 1.7 but your correct its normally not. i remeber reading that to get the f = r/2 but i need the inverses of the f to solve for this your saying, sir? I think the formula i found is it!
    1/f = (1.7-=1)(1/20+1/30) = 17cm
    is 17cm correct?

    I would appreciate anymore of your help, im still lost?
    Dx :wink:
  5. Jun 2, 2003 #4
    That is IMO correct.
    I think this is wrong. Because if you place the object in the focus, there will be no image. I think you should rather use di = 3*do, since you want a magnification of 3.
    Yes you need a proper formula for calculating f1 and f2. The value of n must appear in this formula. Then you use the formula I gave above. Remember this is only correct, if lenses are thin.
  6. Jun 2, 2003 #5
    1) How far from a 50mm focal length lens, such as used in many 35mm cameras, must an object be positioned if it is so to form a real image magnified by a factor of 3?

    I am guessing that it is convex since a there is no way to get a magnified image with a concave.



    1/f=1/do - 1/3do

    1/f=3/3do - 1/3do




    33.33mm=do, here is your answer
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Light: Goemetric Optics
  1. Light and Optics (Replies: 4)

  2. Light and Optics (Replies: 1)

  3. Light and Optics (Replies: 1)

  4. Lights and Optics (Replies: 1)