LIGO experiment Gravity waves

In summary: That's the whole point of the detector, to measure the change in distance between the two test masses due to the passing gravitational wave. If the wave causes the distance to change by a tiny amount, that's a detection.
  • #1
carl susumu
17
0
I read that they found gravity waves that have the frequency of 35 to 250 hz but are not these frequencies that of sound waves? I thought sound does not propagate in vacuum or is there a new kind of gravity vacuum that contains a gravity ether or dark matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
carl susumu said:
are not these frequencies that of sound waves?

Sound waves can be in that frequency range, yes. But that does not mean any wave in that frequency range must be a sound wave.

carl susumu said:
is there a new kind of gravity vacuum that contains a gravity ether or dark matter?

No. Gravitational waves are waves of spacetime curvature.
 
  • #3
Do these gravity waves that have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz make a sound, like a Chirp or something like that?
 
  • #4
carl susumu said:
Do these gravity waves that have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz make a sound, like a Chirp or something like that?

No. They're not sound waves.
 
  • #5
were Weber gravity wave sound waves?
 
  • #6
carl susumu said:
were Weber gravity wave sound waves?

No. The vibrations in Weber's bar detector that were triggered by gravitational waves, if indeed they were (most physicists believe they were actually not gravitational waves but measurement error), could have been considered "sound waves" (although they were much lower frequency than the frequency range you mentioned before). But those are not the same as the gravitational waves themselves (again, assuming his detector was actually detecting them, which it probably wasn't).
 
  • #7
It's generally agreed that Weber didn't detect gravitational waves, he only thought he did. They wouldn't have been sound waves.

By the way the correct term is gravitational wave. A "gravity wave" is one which gets its energy from gravity. Best example, waves on the surface of the sea.

You probably saw some video where they played a "chirp" and said that was the sound made by LIGO's detected waves, right? No. The chirp was sound waves, generated by a conventional sound card, of the same frequency and duration as the gravitational waves.
 
  • #8
And what are the wavelengths of these so called gravity waves?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
carl susumu said:
what are the wavelengths of these so called gravity waves?

Do you mean the gravitational waves that LIGO detected? The wavelengths of those waves are not given in the reports of the detection, probably because they are too long to be measured by the detector. The usual expectation for the wavelength of gravitational waves is that they will be comparable to the size of the source; the "size" in this case would be roughly the horizon radius of the black holes involved, which would be at least tens of kilometers.

carl susumu said:
the structure.. EM?

No, gravitational waves are waves of spacetime curvature, as I said before.

carl susumu said:
the force (pounds) that are being detected.

Gravitational wave detectors like LIGO don't detect force, they detect strain, i.e., the fractional change in size of the detector. The strain of the waves that LIGO detected was around ##10^{-21}##, i.e., the length of the arms of LIGO was changed by a fraction of roughly ##10^{-21}##.
 
  • #10
A wavelength of five thousand miles! And what are the units of the strain, meters? Ha. Ha. Physicists are extremely funny bunnies.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
carl susumu said:
And what are the wavelengths of these so called gravity waves?

Strictly speaking they're so-called gravitational waves, but that's alright.

You mentioned the frequencies were 35 to 250 hz.
Speed of light is 3* 10^5 km / sec.
So wavelengths are 8600 to 1200 km.

But the sound wavelengths are much smaller at the same frequency.
The ratio: speed of sound / speed of light = 1.14 * 10^-6 (assuming dry air, 1 atmosphere pressure).
So sound wavelengths would be 7.54 to 2.2 meters.

The strain has no units, it's a dimensionless number, a ratio of lengths
carl susumu said:
Physicists are extremely funny bunnies.

- Hard to argue with that!
 
Last edited:
  • #12
What are the lengths used to determine the strain?
 
  • #13
carl susumu said:
What are the lengths used to determine the strain?

The strain is a dimensionless quantity. Wiki has a a rather unclear definition, unfortunately, so I won't bother quoting it. If you consider that the base distance between the Ligo test masses is L, and that this distance changes by an amount ##\Delta L## due to the passing gravitational wave, the strain is ##\frac{\Delta L}{L}## which is a dimensionless quantity. For instance you might measure both L and ##\Delta L## in meters, or in centimeter, or in inches. Regardless of which units you use, the ratio, or strain, will be the same.
 
  • #14
Just one more question before I get back to the strain, is the length L decreasing or increasing?
 
  • #15
carl susumu said:
s the length L decreasing or increasing?

It oscillates; the strain is the amplitude of the oscillation.
 

1. What is the LIGO experiment and why is it important?

The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) experiment is a collaboration between scientists and engineers from around the world to detect and study gravitational waves - ripples in the fabric of spacetime caused by the most violent and energetic events in the universe. The LIGO experiment is important because it provides a new way to observe and study the universe, allowing us to gain a deeper understanding of the laws of physics and the origins of the universe.

2. How does the LIGO experiment detect gravitational waves?

The LIGO experiment uses two identical detectors, one in Louisiana and one in Washington state, to detect gravitational waves. Each detector consists of two 4-kilometer-long arms arranged in an L-shape, with powerful lasers and mirrors at the ends of the arms. When a gravitational wave passes through the Earth, it causes the distance between the mirrors to change ever so slightly, which is detected by the lasers and recorded by the detectors.

3. What have we learned from the LIGO experiment so far?

Since its first detection of gravitational waves in 2015, the LIGO experiment has made several groundbreaking discoveries, including the first direct observation of the merger of two black holes, the first detection of a neutron star collision, and the first detection of gravitational waves from a binary system of two neutron stars. These discoveries have provided valuable insights into the nature of gravity, black holes, and the origins of the universe.

4. How does the LIGO experiment contribute to our understanding of gravity?

The LIGO experiment's detection of gravitational waves has confirmed a key prediction of Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity - that accelerating massive objects can cause ripples in the fabric of spacetime. By studying these gravitational waves, scientists can test and refine our understanding of gravity and potentially uncover new laws of physics that govern the universe.

5. What is the future of the LIGO experiment?

The LIGO experiment is constantly being improved and upgraded to increase its sensitivity and detection capabilities. In the future, it is expected to detect even more gravitational waves and potentially open up new avenues of research, such as studying the properties of dark matter and the expansion of the universe. Additionally, there are plans to build more advanced detectors, such as the proposed Einstein Telescope, which could provide even more detailed and precise observations of gravitational waves.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
746
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
863
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
807
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top