1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Limit is equivalent

  1. Dec 22, 2004 #1


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I don't understand how to show that

    [tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left(1-\frac{a}{n} \left)^{n} = e^{-a} \ \ \forall a \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]

    For exemple, if I say "Let x be the real number such that [itex]n=-ax \Leftrightarrow x=-n/a[/itex]. Then the limit is equivalent to

    [tex]\lim_{-ax \rightarrow \infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{x} \right)^{-ax} = \left(\lim_{-ax \rightarrow \infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{x} \right)^{x} \right)^{-a}[/tex]

    "but [itex]-ax \rightarrow \infty[/itex] is not equivalent to [itex]x \rightarrow \infty[/itex], so I can't conclude that the limit is [itex]e^{-a}[/itex].

    What am I missing here ? :confused:
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 22, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    a is constant. true, x will either be going to negative or positive infinity depending on the sign of a, but the definition of e works for either:

    let: [tex]u = -x[/tex]

    [tex]e = \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} (1+\frac{1}{x} )^{x} [/tex]

    [tex]= \lim_{-u \rightarrow \infty} (1+\frac{1}{-u} )^{-u} [/tex]

    [tex]= \lim_{u \rightarrow -\infty} (\frac{1}{(1-\frac{1}{u})})^{u} [/tex]

    [tex]= \lim_{u \rightarrow -\infty} (\frac{1+\frac{1}{u}}{(1-\frac{1}{u^2})})^{u} [/tex]

    and the 1/u2 term becomes negligible, giving the result:

    [tex]e = \lim_{u \rightarrow -\infty} (1+\frac{1}{u} )^{u} [/tex]

    edit: that may not be rigorous enough. you can show the bottom of the fraction above goes to 1 by taking the ln and using l'hopitals. in fact, you might want to just do that from the start.
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2004
  4. Dec 22, 2004 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    [tex]\lim_{n \to -\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n=e[/tex] is true too.
  5. Dec 22, 2004 #4
    Shouldn't -ax be an integer anyway?

    Ok, the limit of (1+1/n)^n is e when n ->oo and n is an integer

    but what happens when we get the value
    where x is a very large real but not an integer ??

    Shouln't we prove this cases ?
  6. Dec 22, 2004 #5

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The identity e = lim(1+1/x)^x is true whether x is an integer or not (as you implicitly use yourself).
  7. Dec 23, 2004 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Elegance is a quality of mathematics:
    [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}(1-\frac{a}{n})^{n}=[\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}(1+\frac{1}{\frac{n}{-a}})^{\frac{n}{-a}}]^{-a}=[\lim_{\frac{n}{-a}\rightarrow\pm\infty}(1+\frac{1}{\frac{n}{-a}})^{\frac{n}{-a}}]^{-a}=e^{-a} [/tex]
    ,where i made use of:
    [tex] \lim_{n\rightarrow\pm\infty}(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}=e [/tex]


    PS.The sign of "a" is irrelevant.It's important for it not to be "0".
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Limit is equivalent
  1. An equivalence? (Replies: 13)

  2. Not equivalent at a? (Replies: 2)