1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Limit of a ratio

  1. Jan 9, 2014 #1

    bobie

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    This is not homework
    Could you help me understand what happens to this function
    [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{100..1^2+199...9}- 100...1}[/tex]
    when the dots are filled with 0's and 9's , shouldn't the result be 1/.99999.....)= 1.?

    but if to this input (http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(100000001^2+199999999)-100000001)&x=9&y=1) ≈ 1.000 000 02,
    I add one digit :(http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/+((sqrt(1000000001^2+1999999999)-1000000001)&x=6&y=7),
    I get: ≈ 0.00002262 which is 1/44208.7

    shouldn't it be 1.000 000 002 ?
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 9, 2014 #2

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    How many 0's and 9's are there to be filled in? If the 0's and 9's are never ending, then there is no such a thing as 100....^2 or 199... : these are just ∞. Also, in this case there is no such a thing as a last digit as in your 100...1 and 199...9. On the other hand, if the number of filled-in 0's and 9's is finite and limited, the answer will depend to some extent on exactly how many are used, and also whether the number of filled-in 0's is the same as the number of 9's.
     
  4. Jan 9, 2014 #3

    bobie

    User Avatar
    Gold Member


    Ray, you can check that in the second link there is just one more 0,9,0, (10 digits vs 9 digits in the first,
    why the result?
     
  5. Jan 9, 2014 #4
    See the small subscript 2 on the 1000000001s of the second link? That means Wolfram interprets them as binary numbers, so you definitely won't get the results you were expecting. This is how you get approx. 1.000000002.
     
  6. Jan 9, 2014 #5

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    bogie, the problem is how wolfram alpha parses your expressions. In your first link, wolfram alpha interprets 100000001 as a being decimal number. In your second link, it interprets 1000000001 as being a binary number.

    Edit DeIdeal beat me to it!
     
  7. Jan 9, 2014 #6

    bobie

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Thanks, I eluded the problem with an artifice (100000000000-1*-1)):http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=...000000000*1-1^2)-(100000000000-1*-1))&x=9&y=8
    Di you know if it is possible to get a curve at alpha , just giving four or five points?
     
  8. Jan 9, 2014 #7

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

  9. Jan 9, 2014 #8

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The result is approximately 10.000 ... (not nearly 1.0!).Wolfram Alpha delivers this if you write something that forces it to interpret 1000000001 in decimal instead of binary. For example, if we write 1000000005-4 instead, we get correct results;
    see http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2F%28sqrt%28%281000000005-4%29^2%2B199999999%29-%281000000005-4%29%29

    It is useful to re-write the problem in a more "understandable" form. Your quantity is
    [tex] F = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a^2 + b} - a}, \\
    \text{where } a = 1000000001, \; b = 199999999 [/tex]
    Since ##b << a^2## we can get a rapidly-converging series expansion that is much more insightful than the original expression. We can write
    [tex] F = \frac{1}{a} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+r}-1}, \; r = b/a^2.[/tex]
    For small ##r## we have a rapidly-converging expansion
    [tex] \sqrt(1+r)-1 = \frac{1}{2}r - \frac{1}{8} r^2 + \frac{1}{16}r^3
    - \frac{5}{128} r^4 + \frac{7}{256} r^5 + \cdots [/tex]
    In our case ##r = b/a^2 \doteq 0.1999999986e-9,## so each new term is about a billion times smaller than the preceding term. Just taking a few terms should give very high precision. Plugging that series for the denominator of F and converting that to another series, we finally get
    [tex]F = 2\frac{a}{b} +\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{a} -\frac{1}{8} \frac{b}{a^3}
    +\frac{1}{16} \frac{b^2}{a^5} -\frac{5}{128} \frac{b^3}{a^7}
    +\frac{7}{256} \frac{b^4}{a^9} + \cdots [/tex]
    For the current case the successive terms in the expansion of F are
    [tex] \text{term 1} \doteq 10.000000060000000300\\
    \text{term 2} \doteq 0.49999999950000000050e-9 \\
    \text{term 3} \doteq -0.24999999800000000525e-19\\
    \text{term 4} \doteq 0.24999999625000002250e-29 \\
    \text{term 5} \doteq -0.31249999312500006500e-39 \\
    \text{term 6} \doteq 0.43749998731250016406e-49
    [/tex]
    This shows very clearly that F is very near 10.0. The above input for Wolfram Alpha gives 10.000000060500000299475001500702507498937225001732106.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Limit of a ratio
  1. : Limits (Replies: 15)

  2. Ratio Question (Replies: 4)

  3. Ratio of a to b (Replies: 2)

  4. Ratio and proportion (Replies: 13)

  5. Ratio Problem (Replies: 6)

Loading...