Limit of this

  • Thread starter ranger
  • Start date
  • #1
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

So I've been given a differential equation that models bacterial growth, p(t), and the concentration of critical substance, q(t), whatever thats suppose to mean. I've solved both of these and found that:
[tex]q(t) = q_0 e^{vt}[/tex]
Where q0 is the amount critical substance at t=0. v is a constant.

I am then asked to take the limit of q(t) as follows:
[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{q(t)} {1 + q(t)}[/tex]
which comes out to be:
[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{ q_0 e^{vt}} {1 + (q_0 e^{vt})}[/tex]

Its been a while since I've done limits of this sort. So how would I approach this?

I'm just doing some exercises. Mentors can move it where they see fit
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
StatusX
Homework Helper
2,564
1
Roughly speaking, the exponential term gets huge while 1 stays about the same size, so the bottom begins to look more and more like the top, and so the limit is 1. More formally, multiply the top and bottome by 1/q(t), and you'll get something that should be slightly easier to deal with. Unless v<0, but since you're talking about "growth", I'm guessing it isn't.
 
  • #3
612
1
Is this limit in an indeterminate form (for certain values of v)? If so can we use l'hopital's rule on it dirrectly?
 
  • #4
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
Roughly speaking, the exponential term gets huge while 1 stays about the same size, so the bottom begins to look more and more like the top, and so the limit is 1. More formally, multiply the top and bottome by 1/q(t), and you'll get something that should be slightly easier to deal with. Unless v<0, but since you're talking about "growth", I'm guessing it isn't.
Thanks for the quick response.

But multiplying the top and bottom by 1/q(t) seems to put me back to where I started.
 
  • #5
612
1
If V>0 what does the numerator's limit tend to? If V>0 what does the denominator's limit tend to? Ask your self the same questions about V<0.
 
  • #6
StatusX
Homework Helper
2,564
1
Doing that leaves 1/(1+1/q(t)). What happens to 1/q(t) when t gets very big?
 
  • #7
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
If V>0 what does the numerator's limit tend to? If V>0 what does the denominator's limit tend to? Ask your self the same questions about V<0.
Well this is my entire problem. If I choose a value greater than zero for v and I let t get bigger and bigger, the overall value increases (inf?). The same happens for the denominator. Conceptually I guess I can see whats going to happen, but I simply forgot how to do these kinds of this with inf on paper. I think the q0 in there is also confusing me. I feel so embarrassed :shy: btw, V would always be greater than zer0 as per the problem parameters.
StatusX said:
Doing that leaves 1/(1+1/q(t)). What happens to 1/q(t) when t gets very big?
The quotient gets smaller and smaller.
 
  • #8
612
1
can you see that if we look at the numerator and denominator as individual functions they each tend towards infinity for v>0? If so do you remember what l'hopital's rule says?
 
  • #9
612
1
let f(t) = q_0e^(vt)
let g(t) = 1 + q_0e^(vt)

l'hopital's rule says that if as t tends towards infinity f(t) tends towards infinity and g(t) tends towards infinity, then the limit as t tends towards infinity of f(t)/g(t) is the same as f'(t)/g'(t).
 
  • #10
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
let f(t) = q_0e^(vt)
let g(t) = 1 + q_0e^(vt)

l'hopital's rule says that if as t tends towards infinity f(t) tends towards infinity and g(t) tends towards infinity, then the limit as t tends towards infinity of f(t)/g(t) is the same as f'(t)/g'(t).
OK, I think i understand what you are saying. So becuase my t is approaching inf, both the numerator and denominator will become inf, giving inf/inf which is indeterminate, so if I keep on taking the derivative, the limit would always be inf/inf, correct? I can make life easier by doing the following:
[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{e^{t}} {e^{t}}[/tex]
But how can I have an indeterminate answer for a problem thats related to population growth?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
703
13
Hello ranger,

multiply your fraction by [tex]\frac{e^{-vt}} {e^{-vt}}[/tex] :

[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{e^{-vt}} {e^{-vt}} \frac{ q_0 e^{vt}} {1 + (q_0 e^{vt})} [/tex]
 
  • #12
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,808
933
Ranger, StatusX's initial suggestion is the simplest. The crucial point is not just that t is going to infinity, but that, according to you q(t) is going to infinity.
Dividing both numerator and denominator of
[tex]\frac{q(t)}{1+ q(t)}[/tex]
by q(t) gives, just as you said before
[tex]\frac{1}{\frac{1}{q(t)}+ 1}[/tex]
Now, as q(t) goes to infinity, again, as you said, 1/q(t) goes to 0 so that whole fraction goes to what?
 
  • #13
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
Ranger, StatusX's initial suggestion is the simplest. The crucial point is not just that t is going to infinity, but that, according to you q(t) is going to infinity.
Dividing both numerator and denominator of
[tex]\frac{q(t)}{1+ q(t)}[/tex]
by q(t) gives, just as you said before
[tex]\frac{1}{\frac{1}{q(t)}+ 1}[/tex]
Now, as q(t) goes to infinity, again, as you said, 1/q(t) goes to 0 so that whole fraction goes to what?
So since 1/q(t) in the denominator goes to zero, we would simply have 1/1. Which of course comes out to be 1, right?

One more question. Taking the limit in the original form (without multiplying by 1/q(t)), we would get inf/inf. But we are sort of manipulating the problem so we dont get a indeterminate answer, which is understandable for a problem like this. But when faced with limits other than this, we would still have to do this sort of thing?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,808
933
If two functions are the same same for all x except the point at which the limit is being taken, then their limits are the same so "manipulating the problem" works. I'm not sure what you mean by "limits other than this". If there is a simpler way to find a limit (for example [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)/g(x)[/itex] where f and g are continuous and g(a) is NOT 0) then you certainly don't HAVE to do it!
 
  • #15
905
4
The others' answers seem more intuitive. But in a pinch, it never hurts to L'Hopitalize a quotient (assuming, of course, that it's an indeterminate form). Do you remember the conditions of L'Hopital's Rule?
 
  • #16
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
The others' answers seem more intuitive. But in a pinch, it never hurts to L'Hopitalize a quotient (assuming, of course, that it's an indeterminate form). Do you remember the conditions of L'Hopital's Rule?
Since this is in indeterminate form, lets see what happens when L'Hopital's rule is applied. But it seems that if I take the derivative of the numerator and denominator, I'd still get inf/inf. I am applying L'Hopital's correctly?
 
  • #17
rbj
2,226
7
So I've been given a differential equation that models bacterial growth, p(t), and the concentration of critical substance, q(t), whatever thats suppose to mean. I've solved both of these and found that:
[tex]q(t) = q_0 e^{vt}[/tex]
Where q0 is the amount critical substance at t=0. v is a constant.

I am then asked to take the limit of q(t) as follows:
[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{q(t)} {1 + q(t)}[/tex]
which comes out to be:
[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{ q_0 e^{vt}} {1 + (q_0 e^{vt})}[/tex]

Its been a while since I've done limits of this sort. So how would I approach this?

I'm just doing some exercises. Mentors can move it where they see fit
it depends on whether [itex]v>0[/itex], [itex]v=0[/itex], or [itex]v<0[/itex] . is that known?
 
  • #18
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
Yup. both v and q0 are greater than zero.

I've already found the limit to be 1. But I want to see how L'Hopital would work. Believe it or not, I dont ever recall using L'Hopital rule to evaluate a limit. But then again its be 1.5 years since calc I.
 
  • #19
VietDao29
Homework Helper
1,423
1
L'Hopital's rule stated that:
If [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \alpha} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}[/tex] is of the Indeterminate Form 0/0 or [tex]\frac{\infty}{\infty}[/tex], g′(x) is nonzero throughout some interval containing [tex]\alpha[/tex], and that the limit: [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \alpha} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}[/tex] exists, then:

[tex]\fbox{\mathop{\lim} \limits_{x \rightarrow \alpha} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \mathop{\lim} \limits_{x \rightarrow \alpha} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}}[/tex]​

In the problem, since v > 0 (as you stated), we have:
[tex]t \rightarrow +\infty \Rightarrow q(t) = q_0 e ^ {vt} \rightarrow \infty[/tex], the limit has the form [tex]\frac{\infty}{\infty}[/tex].
By using L'Hopital's rule, we obtain:
[tex]\lim_{t \rightarrow + \infty} \frac{q_0 e ^ {vt}}{1 + q_0 e ^ {vt}} = \lim_{t \rightarrow + \infty} \frac{(q_0 e ^ {vt})'}{(1 + q_0 e ^ {vt})'} = \lim_{t \rightarrow + \infty} \frac{vq_0 e ^ {vt}}{vq_0 e ^ {vt}} = 1[/tex]
:)
 
Last edited:
  • #20
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
hehe, now I get it. Thank you VietDao29.
 
  • #21
ranger
Gold Member
1,676
1
So as time approaches infinity, the amount of critical substance approaches 1. What is this limit suppose to signify?
 
  • #22
Tom Mattson
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,500
7
I don't think you've interpreted that correctly, ranger. You found that the limit of [itex]q(t)/(q(t)+1)[/itex] is 1. That quantity is not the amount of the critical substance. That amount is [itex]q(t)[/itex] itself. And that quantity tends to infinity as time goes to infinity. That would make sense under the second interpretation of "critical substance" that I presented to you in the Bio forum. At least, it would make sense if the bacteria population had unrestrained growth.

I'm not sure of what the quantity [itex]q(t)/(q(t)+1)[/itex] even means.
 

Related Threads on Limit of this

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
960
Replies
1
Views
622
Replies
1
Views
363
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
Top