Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Limit of Turbulence

  1. Jun 4, 2012 #1
    Just out of curiosity, is there a limit to how turbulent a flow can become? In otherwords, turbulence develop that is so chaotic that no discernible pattern/path can be found in the flow? Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 4, 2012 #2

    Bobbywhy

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Why should there be a limit to "how turbulent a flow can become"? It is nearly impossible now to model simple turbulence even with powerful supercomputers, so how would we even measure extreme chaos?
     
  4. Jun 4, 2012 #3

    boneh3ad

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    In theory, no. In fact, at extremely higher Reynolds numbers, a flow can re-laminarize (e.g. the Princeton Superpipe).

    Otherwise, in a normal situation, turbulence will always involve energy cascades from large flow-scale eddies all the way down to those of the Kolmogorov scale.

    Therein lies the problem in performing a DNS of a full-scale turbulent flow. To accurately resolve the Kolmogorov scale in a given flow field, the mesh must be so fine that the problems often cannot be solved in an economically feasible length of time, even on supercomputers.
     
  5. Jun 4, 2012 #4

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Turbulence is like pornography- you know it when you see it. Often, laminar/turbulent flow can be parametrized by the Reynolds number, with turbulent flow indicated around a Reynolds number Re ~ 10000. At the low end, the onset of turbulence, there appears to be a fairly well-defined transition region. However, AFAIK, there does not appear to be anything fundamentally new regardless of how large the Reynolds number is: Russel Donnelly's group has done a lot of work generating flow regimes as high as Re ~ 10^7- 10^9, and IIRC stellar interiors can reach Re ~ 10^12.
     
  6. Jun 4, 2012 #5

    boneh3ad

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    FWIW, turbulence onset as a function of Reynolds number is only well-defined for pipe flow and perhaps a tiny handful of others. I don't know where 10000 was found, but for things such as airplane wings or automobiles (in the absence of separation), the transition Reynolds number is often much, much higher; well over [itex]10^6[/itex]. The problem is that the onset o turbulence is dependent on more than just the Reynolds number, notably the free-stream disturbances (sound, turbulence, temperature), surface temperature and surface roughness.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Limit of Turbulence
  1. Turbulent flow (Replies: 6)

  2. Mass of turbulence (Replies: 2)

Loading...