Proving a^n/p(n) Tends to Infinity with n

  • Thread starter dichotomy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Infinity
In summary, a^n/p(n), where p is any polynomial and a>1, tends to infinity as n does. I've proved that:a^n/n^k does so, but I'm not sure how to extend this to a complete polynomial such as (c1)n+(c2)n^2+(c3)n^3...thanks for any help
  • #1
dichotomy
24
0
i've to show (as part of a bigger assignment) that

a^n/p(n), where p is any polynomial and a>1, tends to infinity as n does. I've proved that:

a^n/n^k

does so, but I'm not sure how to extend this to a complete polynomial such as

(c1)n+(c2)n^2+(c3)n^3...

thanks for any help

NB: edited
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You've used a for two different things; and forgotton a condition on the first a.

Remember the triangle inequality:

|x+y| <= |x|+|y|

that will help.
 
  • #3
right...well all i can think of at the moment is changing (n^k) to (n+b)^k and prove that it works for that - however i don't think that's valid since (i don't think) every possible polynomial can be created by such an expansion.

i've not a clue where to start with the triangle inequality
 
  • #4
Try proving the reciprical tends to zero, then you can just add different powers of n in the numerator.
 
  • #5
proving the reciprocal goes to zero is exactly how i did a^n/n^k...

but i didn't think you could just add terms in various powers of n and expect the same result as a^n/n^k (or its reciprocal) without proving it?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
also, i think all that is needed is the ratio test for convergence (of the reciprocal) however if I use this when I replace n^k with (b+n)^k (to create the polynomial), i end up with series within series, and I'm not sure what to do with that.

(The ratio test is also what i used for a^n/n^k)
 
  • #7
The nth root test, where you take the nth root as n approaches infinity.

For the numerator, you get (a^n)^(1/n) as n approaches infinity. The powers equate leaving us with just a. The denominator, it becomes p(n)^(1/n) as n approaches infinity. so in the end we get a*p(n)^n. As n approaches infinity, the polynomial will as well. So the result of our nth root test is more than 1. That means it does not converge, and therefore diverges. As n approaches inifinity, both a^n and p(n)^n will be positive, meaning it diverges positively, to infinity.

Note: I didnt use that triangle inequality that matt grime posted, which makes me think i may have done something wrong lol, matt grimes always right...
 
Last edited:
  • #8
There is always more than one way to skin cat. However, you have asserted that

a/p(n)^{1/n} = a*p(n)^n

which is not correct. Your 'proof' also works for a=1, which is unfortunate, as 1/p(n) tends to zero as n tends to infinity.
 
  • #9
The hint was to use the triangle inequality. I don't see anyone doing that. Try to use the triangle inequality to go from studying p(n) to a k*n^r, where k is a constant and r is the degree of p(n) (and no, k is not the coeffeicient of n^r in p(n)).
 
  • #10
dichotomy said:
proving the reciprocal goes to zero is exactly how i did a^n/n^k...

but i didn't think you could just add terms in various powers of n and expect the same result as a^n/n^k (or its reciprocal) without proving it?

That is what the triangle inequality will let you do - You can replace

[tex] | b_r n^r + b_{r-1}n^{r-1} + \ldots b_0|[/tex]

with something larger. Notice that n^r > n^{r-1} for n>1, r>2.
 
  • #11
do you mean:

[tex]| b_r n^r + b_{r-1}n^{r-1} + \ldots b_0| \leq |n^r + n^r + n^r + \ldots \mbox{(to the extent of k)}|[/tex]

which only is true if

[tex]b_{r-s} < n^s \mbox{ and } \ k=r[/tex] where s=1,2,3...

but the coefficients of [tex]n^{r-s}[/tex] are going to be much smaller than any possible value of [tex]n^{r-s}[/tex] once n approaches infinity, such that the first condition can be ignored?

nb: only just started with latex so bear with me...
 
Last edited:
  • #12
What are you using k to mean? Not what I used it to mean.
 
  • #13
ahh damn i knew i must have stuffed something up, couldn't have been that simple that someone else didnt see...ahh o well
 
  • #14
You are talking about orders of magnitude. First, we prove that a^x/ x tends to infinity as x increases beyond all bounds. Consider the function f(x) = log [a^x/ x] = x log a - log x. Surly if we prove that if f(x) goes to infinity, we prove that a^x/ x goes to infinity as well. Now let us consider f'(x) = log a - 1/x. Now for x>c, we have f'(x)>1/2 log a. Let us define g'(x) = 1/2 log a. By the principles of integral,

f(x) - f(c) > g(x) - g(c).f(x) - f(c) > (x-c)*1/2 log a

f(x) > (x-c)*1/2 log a + f(c)

Clearly the right expression goes to infinity as x increases. Thus we have proved that f(x) goes to infinity as well.

Now we have a polynomial of power n and a x^n+1. If p(x) remains positive past a certain point, the expression x^n+1/p(x) goes to infinity - this can be proven using Hopital's law. Now

a^x/p(x) = [a^x/x^n+1]*[x^n+1/p(x)].

We need only to prove that a^x/x^n+1 has a positive limit or is unbounded in order to prove the statement that a^x/p(x) goes to infinity as x increases. We consider, the n+1 th root of the expression that is,

a^x/n+1 / x

This can be rewritten as

1/n+1 * [a^x/n+1 / (x/n+1)]

Putting x/n+1 = y, we have

1/n+1 * [a^y / y]

As was shown, a^y/y goes to infinity as y increases. Thus, the n+1 th root goes to infinity and a^x/x^n+1 goes to infinity as well. Finally, a^x/p(x) goes to infinity.
 
Last edited:

1. What does it mean for a function a^n/p(n) to tend to infinity with n?

When a function a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n, it means that as the value of n increases, the output of the function also increases without bound. In other words, the function approaches infinity as n approaches infinity.

2. What is the significance of proving a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n?

Proving that a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n is important in mathematical analysis and can have practical applications in fields such as engineering and economics. It allows us to understand the behavior of a function as the input variable grows without bound.

3. How can we prove that a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n?

One method of proving that a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n is by using the limit definition of infinity. This involves showing that for any arbitrarily large value M, there exists a corresponding value of n such that when n is greater than this value, the function output is also greater than M.

4. What is the relationship between the values of a and p(n) in proving a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n?

The values of a and p(n) are important in determining whether or not a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n. If a is a positive number and p(n) is a polynomial function with a positive leading coefficient, then a^n/p(n) will tend to infinity with n. However, if a is negative, or p(n) is a constant or a polynomial with a negative leading coefficient, then a^n/p(n) will not tend to infinity with n.

5. Are there any limitations to proving a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n?

Yes, there are limitations to proving a^n/p(n) tends to infinity with n. This method can only be used for functions where the variable n represents a natural number (1, 2, 3, ...). It cannot be applied to functions with other types of inputs, such as real numbers or complex numbers.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
352
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
896
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
973
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
768
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top