Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Limit tends to infinity

  1. Apr 17, 2008 #1
    Why does
    [tex] \lim(1+\frac{1}{x})^x = e[/tex]
    [tex] x->\infty[/tex]
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 17, 2008 #2
    This is one possible definition of the number e.

    What is your definition of e?
  4. Apr 17, 2008 #3

    O so how do i prove this ?
  5. Apr 17, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper


    [tex]L=\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} (1+\frac{1}{x})^x[/tex]

    [tex]ln L =ln \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} (1+\frac{1}{x})^x[/tex]

    [tex]ln L =\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} xln (1+\frac{1}{x})[/tex]

    Then use L'Hopital's Rule twice.
  6. Apr 17, 2008 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    If you don't have a definition of e, then you can't.
  7. Apr 17, 2008 #6
    How do you prove what?:smile:
  8. Apr 17, 2008 #7
    yea how do you prove a definition? maybe he means how do you consistency?
  9. Apr 18, 2008 #8


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Unfortunately, johndoe hasn't gotten back to us to answer the question about what definition of e he is using.

    Yes, many texts define e by that limit. If that is the definition, then no "proof" is required.

    Others, however, treat the derivative of f(x)= ax this way:
    [tex]f(x+ h)= a^{x+ h}= a^x a^h[/tex]
    [tex]f(x+ h)- f(x)= a^xa^h- a^x= a^x(a^h- 1)[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}= a^x\frac{a^h- 1}{h}[/tex]
    Which, after you have shown that
    [tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}[/tex]
    exists, shows that the derivative of ax is just a constant times ax.
    "e" is then defined as the value of a such that that constant is 1:
    [tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{e^h- 1}{h}= 1[/tex]

    We can then argue (roughly, but it can be made rigorous) that if, for h close to 0, (eh-1)/h is close to 1, eh- 1 is close to h and so eh is close to h+ 1. Then, finally, e is close to (h+1)1/h. As h goes to 0, 1/h goes to infinity. letting x= 1/h, (h+1)1/h becomes (1/x+ 1)x so
    [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}(1+ \frac{1}{x})^x= e[/tex]

    Here's a third definition of "e":
    It has become more common in Calculus texts to work "the other way". That is, define ln(x) by
    [tex]ln(x)= \int_1^x \frac{1}{t}dt[/itex]
    From that we can prove all the properties of ln(x) including the fact that it is a "one-to-one" and "onto" function from the set of positive real numbers to the set of all real numbers- and so has an inverse function. Define "exp(x)" to be the inverse function . Then we define "e" to be exp(1) (one can show that exp(x) is, in fact, e to the x power).

    Now, suppose [itex]lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} (1+ 1/x)^x[/itex] equals some number a. Taking the logarithm, x ln(1+ 1/x)must have limit ln(a). Letting y= 1/x, that means that the limit, as y goes to 0, of ln(1+y)/y must be ln(a). But that is of the form "0/0" so we can apply L'hopital's rule: the limit is the same as the limit of 1/(y+1) which is obviously 1. That is, we must have ln(a)= 1 or a= e.
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 18, 2008
  10. Apr 18, 2008 #9

    Ok I see. I didn't know that definition before until I reach a problem requiring me to find that limit.
  11. Sep 25, 2008 #10
    I believe that the definition of e is:

    e is such that when: y=e^x
    dy/dx = e^x

    Hence via the Taylor Series, the actual value of e can be found

Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook