Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Limsup h.w. proofs

  1. Mar 24, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    1. A function f(x) is said to be monotonic increasing in A if for all x1, x2 ∈ A, x1≤x2 implies f(x1)≤f(x2).

    Prove that if f(x) is monotonic increasing in R [f: R→R] and c is a cluster point of R then the limit of f(x) as x→c[tex]^{-}[/tex] exists (might be +∞).

    2. s(δ) = sup{f(x) :0<|x-c|<δ}

    s(δ) is a monotonic decreasing function, hence based on previous result 1, lims(δ) as δ→0[tex]^{+}[/tex] = L[tex]^{+}[/tex], which is defined to be the limsupf(x) as x→c.

    Prove:

    A. If L[tex]^{+}[/tex] = limsupf(x) as x→c, then [tex]\exists[/tex] a sequence x[tex]_{n}[/tex], such that as x[tex]_{n}[/tex]→c, f(x[tex]_{n}[/tex])→L[tex]^{+}[/tex].

    B. If x[tex]_{n}[/tex]→c and x[tex]_{n}[/tex]≠c and f(x[tex]_{n}[/tex])→L then L≤L[tex]^{+}[/tex].

    C. Similarly define L[tex]^{-}[/tex] = liminff(x) as x→c. [This is a monotonic increasing function.]

    Prove that limf(x) as x→c = L if and only if L[tex]^{+}[/tex] = L[tex]^{-}[/tex] = L.


    2. The attempt at a solution

    Ok, so this is what I have so far - I was able to get #1, but got stuck with the proofs for #2.

    1. If f(x) is monotonic increasing (decreasing) then limf(x) as x→c[tex]^{-}[/tex] exists.
    f: R→R
    c ∈R

    Case 1: (Proving a lefthand limit exists for a monotonic increasing function)

    Let L = sup{f(x) : x<c}. We want to show that ([tex]\forall[/tex][tex]\epsilon[/tex]>0) ([tex]\exists[/tex][tex]\delta[/tex]) ([tex]\forall[/tex]x ∈ R) (0<c-x<δ ⇒ |f(x) - L|<[tex]\epsilon[/tex].

    Consider the interval (L - <[tex]\epsilon[/tex], L). [tex]\exists[/tex]x[tex]_{1}[/tex], such that x[tex]_{1}[/tex]<c and L - [tex]\epsilon[/tex]<f(x[tex]_{1}[/tex])≤L [because otherwise L is not the sup, but L - [tex]\epsilon[/tex] would be the sup! So therefore, f(x[tex]_{1}[/tex]) must exist in between those two numbers.]

    Let [tex]\delta[/tex] = c - x[tex]_{1}[/tex].

    [tex]\forall[/tex]x ∈ R if 0<c-x<δ → 0<c-x<c - x[tex]_{1}[/tex] ⇒ x>x[tex]_{1}[/tex], so since f is monotonic increasing f(x)>f(x[tex]_{1}[/tex]).

    Then, because L - [tex]\epsilon[/tex]<f(x[tex]_{1}[/tex])<f(x)≤L,
    L - [tex]\epsilon[/tex]<f(x)≤L and |f(x) - L|<[tex]\epsilon[/tex].


    This is all I have so far! Any help or advice in how to solve part 2 of this problem would be greatly appreciated - thanks so much!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 24, 2008 #2
    I would just like to note - I think the latex imaging might have messed this up, but all the epsilons in the problem should not be listed as superscripts, but should be aligned normally and the 1 by the x, should be a subscript. Also, I left out the other 3 cases for fully proving part 1, but the proof is the same - it pretty much follows...Thanks!
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2008
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook