What is the value of the line integral

In summary, the line integral \int_C F dr is equal to 0 due to the fundamental theorem of line integrals and the fact that the curve C lies on a level surface of the potential function, making all points on the curve have the same value and resulting in a zero integral.
  • #1
UrbanXrisis
1,196
1
Suppose F=F(x,y,z) is a gradient field with [itex]F=\nabla f[/itex], S is a level surface of f, and C is a curve on S. What is the value of the line integral [itex]\int_C F dr[/itex]?

I know the answer is 0 but I cannot visualize why it would be zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I can't remember what a level surface is right now, so please remind me what it is? I seem to recall it is some function set equal to a constant. But honestly don't remember.


The fundamental theorem of line integrals is:
[tex] \int_C \nabla f \cdot d\vec r = f(\vec r(b)) - f(\vec r(a)) [/tex]

Since you said [itex] \vec F [/itex] is a vector field with [itex] \vec F = \nabla f [/itex] you know that the curl is 0. Right?
So since the curl is 0, and a potential function exists (which is f(x,y,z)=f).

I have no idea if this will help, because I really don't remember what a level surface is. I could speculate, or just look it up...
 
  • #3
Ok. I looked it up. So level surface would be if you set f(x,y,z) equal to some constant. Now, you have a curve that lies on this surface.

Ummm... is that the full question?
This kinda seems harder then I originally thought it was going to be. Might need to use Stoke's thm, or wait for someone else to give you some better advice :) Cause I don't know why it would be zero either. (but shoot, that doesn't mean anything)

*sorry dude.

Personally, I would make up some examples and test them out to get a better understanding.
 
  • #4
Try Stoke's theorem.

Hint: curl of the gradient ?
 
  • #5
Stoke's works nicely. Actually, in this simple case, it's just the "fundamental theorem of calculus": since F= grad f, the integral of F on any path is independent of the path- it's just f evaluated at the endpoints. But this is a closed path. We can take the two endpoints to be the same.
 
  • #6
Halls:
Just out of curiosity. How do you know it is a closed path? That greatly simplfies it. Let's just say it is not... then in general, it would not be zero right?
 
  • #7
FrogPad said:
I can't remember what a level surface is right now, so please remind me what it is? I seem to recall it is some function set equal to a constant. But honestly don't remember.


The fundamental theorem of line integrals is:
[tex] \int_C \nabla f \cdot d\vec r = f(\vec r(b)) - f(\vec r(a)) [/tex]

Since you said [itex] \vec F [/itex] is a vector field with [itex] \vec F = \nabla f [/itex] you know that the curl is 0. Right?
So since the curl is 0, and a potential function exists (which is f(x,y,z)=f).

I have no idea if this will help, because I really don't remember what a level surface is. I could speculate, or just look it up...

This automatically shows that the result is zero because the curve C is on a level surface of the potential function (as stated in theoriginal post). That means that all the points on that surface have the same value of "f". therefore the end and starting points of the curve have the same value of f therefore the integral is zero.
 
  • #8
Ahh yeah. That makes sense.

When I originally read the problem I was thinking that the fundamental theorem would easily show that it is zero... But, then I wasn't sure if it was a closed path or not. Didn't see how to get to that step from the question. Got it now.
 

1. What is a line integral?

A line integral is a type of integral that is used to calculate the total value of a function along a specific path or curve in a two- or three-dimensional space. It takes into account both the magnitude and direction of the function at each point along the path.

2. How is a line integral different from a regular integral?

The main difference between a line integral and a regular integral is that a line integral takes into account the path or curve along which the function is being integrated, whereas a regular integral only considers the overall area under the curve.

3. What is the purpose of a line integral?

A line integral is often used in physics and engineering to calculate quantities such as work, flux, and circulation. It is also used in vector calculus to solve problems involving curves and surfaces in three-dimensional space.

4. How is a line integral calculated?

A line integral can be calculated using a variety of methods, including the fundamental theorem of calculus, Green's theorem, or Stokes' theorem. The specific method used depends on the type of function and the path or curve being integrated.

5. What is the significance of the value obtained from a line integral?

The value obtained from a line integral represents the cumulative effect of the function along the specified path or curve. It can be used to understand and analyze physical phenomena, and is an important tool in many areas of science and mathematics.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
410
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
449
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
360
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
130
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
975
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top