I have a book that goes though a detailed development of the following:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\left[\begin{matrix}J^TJ & J^TV\\ VJ & D \end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix}p_1 \\ p_2\end{matrix}\right] = \left[\begin{matrix}J^Tr\\ Vr + Ds \end{matrix}\right][/tex]

where V and D are diagonal matrices and everything is known except [itex]p_1[/itex] and [itex]p_2[/itex].

Then it says "since the lower right submatrix D is diagonal, it is easy to eliminate [itex]p_2[/itex] from this system and obtain a smaller n x n system to be solved for [itex]p_1[/itex] alone." The implication is that it's so easy, explanation isn't needed. However, I don't see it.

Can someone explain how to eliminate [itex]p_2[/itex] given D is diagonal?

I've managed to come up with:

[tex][VJ(J^TJ)^{-1}J^TV - D]p_2 = VJ(J^TJ)^{-1}J^Tr - Vr - Ds[/tex]

but this seems far more complicated than what is implied and I don't see how D being diagonal simplifies anything.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Linear Algebra Problem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**