1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Linear algebra questions

  1. Dec 4, 2007 #1
    1. Let V and W be finite dimensional vector spaces with dim(v) = dim(w). Let {v1,v2,...,vn} be a basis for V. If T:V->W is a one to one linear transformation, determine if {T(v1), T(v2), ... , T(vn)} is a basis for W.

    2. How do i get a matrix out of this: Let A be an 8x5 matrix with columns a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, where a1, a3, and a5 form a linearly independent set and a2=2*a1+3*a5, and a4=a1-a3+2*a5.

    I have looked all over, and I have starts to each of these problems, any help would be received with much thanks.

    So far, for 1. I know that it is true by a theorem I found, but I am really unsure how to prove it.

    on 2. I made a matrix like this

    1 2 0 1 0
    0 0 1 -1 0
    0 3 0 2 1

    I reduced it and came up with the answer that the dimension of NulA is 2 because it reduces to having 2 free variables.

    If this is the wrong way to get the matrix A, how do I do it?

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 4, 2007 #2
    Here's a hint for #1:

    You will need to use the fact that f is one-to-one. You want to show that any w in W can be written as a linear comibination of the { T(v1), ... , T(vn) }. Well, if f is one-to-one, what can you say about [tex]f^{-1}(w)[/tex]? Moreover, any v (such that f(v) = w) can be written as a linear combination of v1 through vn. What happens when you evaluate f(v) ?
     
  4. Dec 4, 2007 #3

    JasonRox

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    You're constructing it right, but that's not an 8x5! It's a 3x5 (sometimes I get confused on which are rows/columns).

    For question 1, show that { T(v1), ... , T(vn) } is linearly independent and then you're done.
     
  5. Dec 4, 2007 #4
    How would I go about doing that?

    Right now, I'm trying to find an answer using the invertible matrix theorem.
     
  6. Dec 6, 2007 #5
    for 1 - if T is linear from V-->W, linearly independent subsets of V always map to linearly independent subsets of W. Since you have a basis for V, it's linearly independent. All you really have to show is that the LI subset you get in W is actually a basis for W. But since the dim(V)=dim(W)=n, you mapped n LI vectors to an LI subset with n vectors. Therefore, you have a basis.

    If you have to, make a lemma for the part that LI subsets of V map to LI subsets of W (you need the injectivity (1-1) of T for this part). It's pretty easy to show with a proof by contradiction if you get stuck.
     
  7. Dec 7, 2007 #6

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Given a vector space U with basis [itex]\{u_1, u_2, ..., u_n}[/itex], a vector space V with basis [itex]\{v_1, v_2, ..., v_n\}[/itex], and a linear transformation, T, from U to V, a standard way of writing T as a matrix (with respect to those bases) is to apply T to each basis vector,[itex]u_1, u_2, ..., u_n[/itex] in turn. Applying T to [itex]u_i[/itex] will give a vector in V which can be written as a linear combination , [itex]a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ ...+ a_nv_n[/itex]. Those coefficients, [itex]a_1, a_2, ... a_n[/itex] are the numbers in the i row of the matrix.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Linear algebra questions
Loading...