- #1

- 308

- 0

{[tex] e^x,e^{2x}[/tex]}

- Thread starter evagelos
- Start date

- #1

- 308

- 0

{[tex] e^x,e^{2x}[/tex]}

- #2

- 259

- 3

ae^x+be^2x=0 must have the only solution a,b=0.

Differentiate to obtain,

ae^x+2be^2x=0

Subtract the first equation from the second to obtain,

be^2x=0

which is true if and only if b=0.

Then it is obvious that a=0.

Therefore, e^x and e^2x are linearly independent.

- #3

- 607

- 0

- #4

- 308

- 0

Would you say that your definition is equivalent to:definitionsays: if [tex]a,b[/tex] are constants and [tex]a e^x + b e^{2x} = 0[/tex] for all [tex]x[/tex], then [tex]a = b = 0[/tex].

for all a,b,x and [tex]ae^x + be^{2x}=0[/tex] ,then a=b=0 ?

or in a more combact form:

for all a,b,x [tex][ae^x + be^{2x} =0\Longrightarrow ( a=b=0)][/tex]

- #5

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 956

"For all a, b" makes no sense if "a= b= 0".Would you say that your definition is equivalent to:

for all a,b,x and [tex]ae^x + be^{2x}=0[/tex] ,then a=b=0 ?

or in a more combact form:

for all a,b,x [tex][ae^x + be^{2x} =0\Longrightarrow ( a=b=0)][/tex]

Just "if, for all x, [tex]ae^x + be^{2x}=0[/tex] ,then a=b=0" or

"(for all x [tex]ae^x + be^{2x} =0)\Longrightarrow ( a=b=0)[/tex]"

- #6

- 308

- 0

You mean that a and ,b cannot have any other value apart from zero??"For all a, b" makes no sense if "a= b= 0".

Just "if, for all x, [tex]ae^x + be^{2x}=0[/tex] ,then a=b=0" or

"(for all x [tex]ae^x + be^{2x} =0)\Longrightarrow ( a=b=0)[/tex]"

In that case you do not have to prove anything because ae^x + be^2x =0

OR given any a,b,x and if [tex] ae^x + be^{2x} =0[/tex] ,then you can prove that the only value a and b can take is zero??

- #7

- 607

- 0

Incomplete. How about this...[tex](\text{for all } x,\; ae^x + be^{2x} =0)\Longrightarrow ( a=b=0)[/tex]

[tex]\text{for all } a,\; \text{for all } b\; [(\text{for all } x,\; ae^x + be^{2x} =0)\Longrightarrow ( a=b=0)][/tex]

- #8

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 956

Given that [itex]ae^x+ be^{2x}= 0[/itex] for all x, then, taking x= 0, [itex]a+ b= 0[/itex]. Since [itex]ae^x+ be^{2x}= 0[/itex] for all x, differentiating with respect to x, [itex]ae^x+ 2be^{2x}= 0[/itex] for all x and, setting x= 0 again, [itex]a+ 2b= 0[/itex]. Subtracting the first equation from the second, (a+ 2b)- (a+ b)= b= 0. Putting b= 0 in either equation, a= 0. Is that what you are asking?You mean that a and ,b cannot have any other value apart from zero??

In that case you do not have to prove anything because ae^x + be^2x =0

OR given any a,b,x and if [tex] ae^x + be^{2x} =0[/tex] ,then you can prove that the only value a and b can take is zero??

NO!! It makes NO sense say "for all a, a= 0"! "If, for all x, ax= 0, then a= 0." It makes no sense to say "for all a" there.Incomplete. How about this...

[tex]\text{for all } a,\; \text{for all } b\; [(\text{for all } x,\; ae^x + be^{2x} =0)\Longrightarrow ( a=b=0)][/tex]

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 722

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 10K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 737

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 583

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 8K